Law professor had an off in the New York Times, she writes the Supreme Court has become an agent of partisan warfare to the extent it could do real damage to the institution. Is the Supreme Court to political . Republicans, 202 7488001. Democrats, 202 7488000. Independents, 202 7488002. You can make a comment on social. Edia, cspanwj here is the oped from yesterdays New York Times, resetting the post scalia Supreme Court. Been his death, there has plenty of talk about the substantial impact his absence will have on the Supreme Court stockett. Fate has handed the justices a chance to hit reset. Uncharitable and tasteless, so be it. I have become conserved the majority is permitting the court become an agent of partisan warfare to an extent that threatens real warfare to the institution. His role on and off the bench contributed to that development. I am not claiming he was completely responsible, given the polarizing politics of the day. More people disapprove of the court, 50 approve o
There a specific visibility point when the mist becomes fog? public service fog is 200 metres. it is all about how far you can see. we have observations across the uk either somebody going out in the middle of the night every hour or every half an hour looking at how far they can see, although there are automatic observation networks as well. that is my favourite fact of the week. fascinating. what do you put on your cv. fog isjust like having your head in the cloud. clouds are made up head in the cloud. clouds are made up of tiny water droplets, that is what fog is made up. some of us live in a permanent state of fog in the case. thank you very much. well i never. you learn something new every day. let s have a look at some of today s front pages. like many of the papers,