the bottom line question is this why are you satisfied or maybe i could even use the word happy with this deal? again, we had an objectsive. the objective was to block all four pathways to a bomb for iran if they chose to go that path. they claimed they re not going that path but we want verification. through a combination of limiting their technology deployment limiting their access to uranium stockpiles, limiting their access to plutonium and most importantly vastly increasing our access and transparency to their nuclear activities we feel confident we will immediately upon the agreement being installed, we will jump from a two to three month so-called broke eded break out time to a bomb, if they chose to go that way, for over a year to at
objectsive to block romney and to have a contested tampa convention. which marco rubio explained last night. i think cojently, would be a disaster. for the party, what they are hearing from the elder statesman, up-and-comers and everybody in between, step out. do it for the party, and you re not going to win any way. help us win in november. i think it makes sense. shannon: we did hear from senator rubio last night and we have a little of what he had to say. there is no way that anyone can convince me that having a fight at the convention in tampa in august is a recipe for victory in november. on the contrary. it s a recipe for disaster. i am endorsing mitt romney. the reason why, not only is because he is the republican nominee and he offers a stark contrast to the president s record. shannon: do you think there is anything beyond this? a lot of people want to read into this endorsement that
it s not the objective. the objectsive prevent iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. had they done that and slowed iran nuclear progress? not really in any measure rabble sense. the critics fault most of the president decision on iran from the initial attempt to engage with the country to the decision not to destroy the surveillance drone that went down on iran this month. bombing the drone could have been an act of war. to say we could go in and prevent act of war to destroy intelligence platform would considering the consequences perhaps is more political than military. anthony says the dependence to look at the latest threat from iran as crisis for the moment but it s been building up for years. there is no quick answer, and no good way out. all we can do is find the best of some options. it is going to go on. it affects the global economy and affects iraq and
hold on. sink ship, what ship? kimberly: your ship with the hole in the bottom. eric: can we point something out, kimberly. i love you, but she wanted chris christie to run so we didn t have to have mitt romney. kimberly: i get what you are talking about, but she is talking from a different perspective. if the republicans want to win, the end game, the goal, objectsive defeat barack obama. send him packing. evict him from the white house. if that is the goal, you have to pick someone who who bob: brian wants to make a point. brian: on behalf of your senile aunt. she is watching. she doesn t know what is happening but she is watching. you should apologize. number two, this is the same woman that could not rally around john mccain because he was too moderate. what is happening four years that ann coulter, conservative conservative who meets with conservatives who meet with other conservatives come down with a strategy. i wonder is she doing something that will surprise you,
cain says it s time to set the record straight. i will talk about all future firestorms. here s one thing people don t know about herman cain. i m in it to win it. i m not going to be discouraged. well, mary snow has the latest developments and mark preston is looking at the political fallout. mary, let s go ahead and begin with you. what caused cain to reverse course all of a sudden and decide to hold this news conference? you know, kyra, last week when herman cain railed against the press for bringing up these allegations of sexual harassment he was highly critical of anonymous users, but that all changed yesterday with a person who came forward who now brings a name, a face and specific allegations. and, you know, yesterday when sharon bialek had this news conference, herman cain s campaign came out with a general, broad statement saying that all allegations of sexual harassment against him were false. by last night, the campaign had started raising questions about s