going to wear down or wear out the one juror to try and get consensus because i got to believe if it was 4-8 or 6-6, they would have probably gotten to the point of telling the judge we are not going to get anywhere. so, my tea leaves is that it may just be one juror holding it all up. so, sarah, no questions today. i agree with mark, that was the thing that stood out to me the most, particularly after getting the question from the jury the other day where they said what if we can t reach a consensus? today, they were just behind closed doors. what does that signal to you? well i leave the sta tibtics to mark because i am not good at that. but you know, it s so difficult to tell what is going on with the jury. why they are taking so long. um, even though o mara-azari dream team with 50 plus years of trial experience can t really say for certain but the three questions that we have gotten over the past thee days and we can t forget about question one on monday um, are very impor
that. but you know, it s so difficult to tell what is going on with the jury. why they are taking so long. um, even though o mara-azari dream team with 55-plus years of trial experience can t really say for certain but the three questions that we have gotten over the past thee days and we can t forget about question one on monday um, are very important. and to me, they are really one compound question. that question on monday was about the testimony of the defense psychologist. the the guy that the prosecution argued was, um, the hired gun, you know, testifying just for the purpose of trial. and and the jurors asked, um, when was he when did he interview potter? and that goes translation, you know, that goes to credibility. do we believe what he says about an action error? um, can we believe him? or was he just hired for trial as the prosecution argued? and when you put that together with the other two questions, it tells us that they are struggling with the reasonableness