murder? or accidentally committing a? and he told my mom about dexter. you see the show dexter, this is all modeled after dexter. when you take a step back, you see this is a real man who s been murdered. it was darker than anyone knew. holy mackerel! everyone is on the edge of their seat. an underground parking garage. you re watching a violent attack, caught on tape. who is this? what is happening? or did it happen at all? movies, like that one. are by design deceptive. they blur words. but have you noticed, maybe it s all the technical doodads. the digital cameras. the reality pristine editing. some stories have claimed to be true. are not. anybody can manipulate reality, but sometimes what they say is true, isn t. sometimes fiction turns out to be fact. and then there are stories, just a few, in which fact and fiction hughes. and that s where we re going tonight. a twilight zone world. an illusion. and deception. and deceit. follow the howling wind, no
Ones that went to the police and they basically had nothing other than the emails. there was one thing though, and it came from mark. he wondered, he said, if maybe. somebody was being set up. because, it just doesn t sit right so the first thing i started asking myself is, who all knows about we do in there about our works and stuff like that? was the disappearance stage somehow? but if someone was being fooled, who was it and why? was all of this just some big stunt, even a publicity stunt? the detective was thoroughly engaged by now. he had spent a career listening to criminal spin their stories and maybe he could figure out if the twitchell guy was trying to play the cops somehow and he pulled a recording of the interview. you know i watched the interview and i m looking at but the guy says. but i m noticing signs of d. c..
Stunt, even a publicity stunt? the detective was thoroughly engaged by now. he had spent a career listening to criminal spin their stories and maybe he could figure out if the twitchell guy was trying to play the cops somehow and he pulled a recording of the interview. you know i watched the interview and i m looking at but the guy says. but i m noticing signs of d. c.. and mark interviewed really well. there were no signs of deception. he is free-flowing with the information and answering the questions logically. i don t see any looking away or any of the nervousness, nothing. i see nothing. and then when police looked into the production company express entertainment, they encountered a really legitimate company. more than that. this was a promising effort in northern alberta. it was a potential center of moviemaking. and mark was very good at drumming up attention to money from local investors like john dissent. he was a very sharp, bright, young, entrepreneur.
Other than the emails. there was one thing though, and it came from mark. he wondered, he said, if maybe. somebody was being set up. because, it just doesn t sit right so the first thing i started asking myself is, who all knows about we do in there about our works and stuff like that? was the disappearance stage somehow? but if someone was being fooled, who was it and why? was all of this just some big stunt, even a publicity stunt? the detective was thoroughly engaged by now. he had spent a career listening to criminal spin their stories and maybe he could figure out if the twitchell guy was trying to play the cops somehow and he pulled a recording of the interview. you know i watched the interview and i m looking at but the guy says. but i m noticing signs of d.c.. and mark interviewed really