Could be deal with be a dissass stare disaster for rayle? supers of the idea of a diplomatic solution for this. some of the features that we ve heard about of this deal seem weak. it is true. the alternative to a deal no deal is also no solution. if there is no deal then iran can move back toward nuclear breakout if it wants. does there have to be a deal right now? does it have to be a deal right now, it seems as if it seems as if the ayatollah, the ultimate arbiter of this if this doesn t work in the coming months or month even the people who are doing the negotiateing, the foreign minister, these guys are going to lose whatever choose they have inside the system and the hard liners take over. this might be the moment to get the best deal possible. jeffrey, you can certainly understand i didn t mean to interrupt you. you can certainly understand
Stop for netanyahu 6,000 miles away from the closest voter. he s in a very tight race with the center right party and he needs to shore up his right wing base. he doesn t want voters drifting away from his party to some further right party. so this is an attempt to keep them in line. he needs to he just needs seats at this point. doesn t he risk alienating as many israelis as he gains? israelis he s going to alienate are not going to vote for him anyway. that s the calculation. they re voting from the center to the left. the people on the right mistrust obama and they like this kind of churchillian he s taking that only b.b. is strong enough to stand up to the president of the united states. as you noer very well churchill was mocked and ridiculed for warning of a coming threat in nazi germany. yeah. could netanyahu be right?
Lengthen the fuse in any breakout scenario. what about france and others that are objecting, israel, what do you think that tells us? it s not clear exactly what the israelis are doing? i think we should hope what the israelis are doing is simply to play bad cop, to try to get the best deal possible. but prime minister netanyahu s rhetoric has been so far off to the other side that it raises the question that perhaps he is actually trying to blow up the negotiations, perhaps he doesn t want a deal. that would be enormously damaging. if attend of the day, we don t get a deal between the international community and iran and israel is the culprit, that backfires completely against israel and against the united states and very much in favor of iran s hard liners, exactly the people netanyahu shouldn t be trying to empower. there s some part of this, the french have taken a slightly harder line position on the
If suddenly iran transformed itself into germany or sweden or france there would be a different set of conversations about their nuclear infrastructure. and for the the record israel has given some alternatives. israel is weighing in with the changes they re seeking. they include a complete stop to nuclear research and development and the closure of underground facility as an enrichment site. john heilemann, a lot of people have been saying netanyahu shouldn t come over. what business is it of netanyahu, et cetera et cetera et cetera. we see in chuck schumer, the most powerful democrat now in the senate because he s he s going to be taking harry reid s place. a guy stepping up like a lot of democrats are going to start stepping up. and not just because they re afraid of netanyahu or because they re afraid of apack but because guys like chuck schumer have been pro israel for a very very long time. this has been hard for them to
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20150302:11:59:30 - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.