The Supreme Court recently held that recipients of a fixed deposit cannot suffer at the cost of the criminal conduct of the Bank officials and that, in such an event the Bank would be held vicariously.
Buyers said that they could not take possession of their flats because contrary to what the developer had told the apex court, many flats were not ready for possession as they did not have an OC, which is mandatory prior to handing over possession.
The national consumer court granted relief to the man, despite the attempts by Mahatma Gandhi Mission Hospital to portray the case as an extortion attempt by the boy’s father.