Is at that level. he doesn t have experience and background to perform and funs in that job. in addition to the fact they are looking at raw intelligence and describing to the public and the committee what it is they are seeing. raw intelligence is up to interpretation and to context. i would say also we re seeing reporting now that the president himself wants to see raw intelligence. in my experience that never works out. and why is that? what is it raw intelligence? difficult, doesn t seem devin nunes understood what he was seeing. he looked at the information and thought it was a bombshell. adam schiff who was ranking member looked at the same information and said he didn t see why it was necessary to go the route that nunes did. i m going to go to naviyd on that. how can it be two of these members of congress looked at that same raw intelligence and
Departure from the years of president obama and seshl secretary kerry and their hope for a two-state solution. and donald trump has tweeted as well, you know, get ready forrian 20th. friedman by all accounts is a hard-liner when it comes to policy around settlements. as you said moving that embassy to jerusalem. naviyd, israel is a hot button topic not just here in america but across the globe. you saw all but one security councilmember approve that resolution. do you think a donald trump presidency and the approach there to israel is going to change more than just u.s./israeli relations? yes. i mean, clearly, united states is in a very difficult position. at the end of eight years whether you are for obama or not, the united states is in a position where our influence on the world stage is in dplin. when you look at israel and many states we re relying on with syria, iraq, certainly with russian forays into that it s