Probably would take issues with them and articulate that in the coming days. Host one of those issues is that it doesnt preempt states from doing their own thing. Guest as i read the piece, its not a proactive preemption structure. Still allows the commission to go forward and challenge states where the item would be in conflict with our rules. So i think its going to lead to more state by state challenges, a case by case challenge, if you will, than the overall arching one that i was hoping for. I think what youre going to see is a number of states is have done things that i disagree with, and having 50 different states pull us in Different Directions is not what, you know, the structure should be. Its not interstate commerce. Its why we have an interstate Commerce Clause are, in by opinion, and its not something they have expertise in, because theyre supposed to be governing intrastate traffic. And there is no intrastate traffic on the internet. Host joining us to drill down into thi
House, the supreme court, and Public Policy events from washington, d. C. And around the country, so you can make up your own mind. Crated by cable in 1979, cspan is brought to you by your local or cable satellite provider. Cspan, your unfiltered view of government. Peter and Michael Orielly is one of five commissioners on the federal communications commission, and he is our guest tonight on the communicators. Welcome. I want to get your Immediate Reaction to the Net Neutrality case. Commissioner orielly im still digesting the decision from the court read it is quite lengthy. From the court. It is quite lengthy. But im generally pleased. They seem to have found the right landing spot on a couple of decisions. There are a couple of pieces i would take issue with that will articulate that in coming days. Peter well, one of those issues that has been reported already is that it doesnt preempt states from doing their own thing. Commissioner orielly as i read the piece, its not a proactive
Your local cable or satellite provider. Speech than, your unfiltered view of government. Host Michael Orielly is one of five commissioners on the federal Communications Commission and he is our guest this week on the communicators. Welcome back. Commissioner orielly, its only been about an hour since the court decided the Net Neutrality case. Want to get your immediate reaction. Guest in fairness unstressed digesting the item, the decision from the court. Its quite lengthy. Im generally pleased. They seem to have found the right landing spot in a number of decisions. Our couple pieces i probably would take issue with them and probably articulate that in the coming days. Host one of the issues thats been reported is that it doesnt preempt states from doing their own thing. Guest as i read it its not a proactive preemption structure. It still allows the commission to go forward and child in states with the item would be in conflict with our rules. Its going to lead to more statebystate c
The sec held an open meeting and voted on several issues flgt roboCall Blocking regulations, media ownership rules. Held in washington dc. This is four hours. Good morning. Welcome to the november 201 meeting of the federal communication commission. Madame secretary, announce the agenda for the morning. Thank you chairman. Good morning. For todays meeting you will hear eight items for consideration. First you will consider a report in order that would expressly authorize Voice Service providers to block certain types of row bow calls that falsely appear to be from telephone numbers that do not or cannot make out going calls. It would prohibit Voice Service providers from blocking 911 calls urpd the rules and encourage Voice Service providers to provide a mechanism to allow subscribers who le jet mat calls are in order to stop such blocking and clarify providers may exclude blocked calls under these rules from their call completion report. Second you will consider a report a second repo
Good morning. Welcome to the november 201 meeting of the federal communication commission. Madame secretary, announce the agenda for the morning. Thank you chairman. Good morning. For todays meeting you will hear eight items for consideration. First you will consider a report in order that would expressly authorize Voice Service providers to block certain types of row bow calls that falsely appear to be from telephone numbers that do not or cannot make out going calls. It would prohibit Voice Service providers from blocking 911 calls urpd the rules and encourage Voice Service providers to provide a mechanism to allow subscribers who le jet mat calls are in order to stop such blocking and clarify providers may exclude blocked calls under these rules from their call completion report. Second you will consider a report a second report in order and second further notice of proposed rule making order on reconsideration and memorandum opinion in order that would make available 1,700 megahert