There to find their way into the site. But i am keenly aware when i write about china now i am being read not but just by my motherinlaw but by chinese. And i think that does raise your game. Again, i hope by it takes me back to a that you question ducked earlier on new technology and the effect that has. The New York Times benefited from the wikileaks story. The New York Times decided that it would send a team of reporters to another newspaper in england where the information already was, so it was no act of journalistic genius to go over there and pick up that information and then put it into the times. So what does that mean about the times and a fitting from wikileaks . Is that a good thing . Are they to be proud of the fact that they made that decision . You should really ask Arthur Sulzberger that. Bill keller. He was seated here, and i did ask him. What did he say . He made an effort to answer it, which is more than you are doing. [laughter] you see, im trying to understand. The
Does matter from a lot of perspectives and makes us more capable if we do it right which is the key. I think escaped one up there. A partnership and collaboration. We are not doing this without partnership. There is person back there that talks to me more about the publicprivate partnerships. That is a we are doing right now with some of the folks. I think that is the key to a lot of our future. Proactive versus reactive. I cannot even jump on that. Proactive has to occur on both sides versus reactive. There is a global context. I am not sure everyone understands. I would argue that some parts of industry and not fully understand the impacts of that particular piece. But i think it gives the market. That is an important part. Road map with midterm and far term. We made a conscious choice that dynamic sharing in this last spectrum change was not available to us from both a technological side as well as the regulatory side. In the next change i think that it will be which is a critical p
Partners. The irony is where brazil and india governments are, the bottom line is reforms need to happen internally that are about legal questions, but theres also a strategic level of interest that needs to go on here. [inaudible] do you think there is a possibility of a parallel within the United States . Great question. In the book, there is a chapter on the chinese approach. One of the key aspects besides the Massive Campaign of intellectual property theft, you have how this links into an assassins doctrine where youre looking at a potential enemy and saying, im going to turn their strengths into a weakness. The ability to mobilize massive Human Capital behind it. This is used to describe the internal selfcensoring model, the human flesh Search Engine is how it translates. When you talk about the number of folks involved, a mix of cyber militia and patriotic hacker communities, the scale is enormous. It is measuring and hundreds of thousands of folks. Most of those are people who a
So it is going to be different for different people, but ive found in my own travels and experience their, it remains a very, powerful and deep emotion. I do not think there is any doubt about that at all. In an american context we know that the First Amendment to the u. S. Constitution lays out a certain set of principles of freedom. Togress cannot do anything abridge our freedom of religion, speech, press, the right to peaceably assemble, to petition our government for redress of grievances. They are laid out there, and they are large concepts. They are the underpinning, really, for the society. They have been described as godgiven. Im wondering if you share that view. Gosh, i confess i have never whetherabout, you know, they are godgiven, but again, when i think of our own society i will give you the journalistic response. Thats a duck. No, it is because i am not a philosopher. Tellays, when ever people me chinas stealing our secrets, ook, iwer always is, l dont encourage industrial
A question. Actually two questions. One, the portability aspect of new slegs legislation, how much does it conflict with state level Health Insurance and state level mandates that differ, of course, widely . How do you reconcile the provision that we have Health Coverage, all of it has a 10th amendment contest really. We stipulate that anybody that has a nexus for their Health Coverage with the federal government, then thats where it applies. So for example if our individual membership associations which would have a nexus with the federal government because it allows paur cross state lines, they would be able to own that. Individuals who are in any erisa plan, they would be able to own that. So it gets to that by making certain that everybody has a nexus with the federal overnment. One more quick question. I think weve seen how much patients and prospective patients are resistant to the law. Looking at the damages, pharmaceuticals, hospitals, clinics, how much pushback is Congress Hea