give state governments to start running elections? could they not come up with laws that would make it very cumbersome to disenfranchise people, disincentivize people to go out and even register? what about that? well, basically the reason we have section 5 is that these states were gaming the system. they would impose unconstitutional laws. sure. that would infringe voting. hen they were struck down. that would immediately pass another one. so the laws were all reactive. this made it proactive. it made the states come to the federal government to look at these types of plans. if you get rid of it, you return to that past system where you can have the sort of monty card game going on where you re not too sure where the laws are going to end up on voting on the day of voting. and we have seen a lot of these
federal government to look at these types of plans. if you get rid of it, you return to that past system where you can have the sort of monty card game going on where you re not too sure where the laws are going to end up on voting on the day of voting. and we have seen a lot of these encumbrances in just the last election across the country. are you troubled by scalia s comments about the congress making these decisions instead of the supreme court? that maybe they should be doing it? i was it was a breathtaking comment. it was also pretty ill-conceived. i mean not only is he getting the entitlement wrong as to whose entitlement should really be worried about here, i thought it was humorous. it has such a nice name whom. would vote against it. he didn t seem bothered by the patriot act that had a pretty nice name too, but he didn t question that one. but what is really amazing is he was articulating what we call a super legislature system where
to that past system where you can have the sort of monty card game going on where you re not too sure where the laws are going to end up on voting on the day of voting. and we have seen a lot of these encumbrances in just the last election across the country. are you troubled by scalia s comments about the congress making these decisions instead of the supreme court? that maybe they should be doing it? i was it was a breathtaking comment. it was also pretty ill-conceived. i mean not only is he getting the entitlement wrong as to whose entitlement should really be worried about here, i thought it was humorous. it has such a nice name whom. would vote against it. he didn t seem bothered by the patriot act that had a pretty nice name too, but he didn t question that one. but what is really amazing is he was articulating what we call a super legislature system where the judges sit as the super legislature. many conservatives use that as a way of describing judicial