letting the bush rates expire for the richest. you argue this is not the time to do that. do you think and i know you want to see mitt romney elected, but if the president were re-elected, do you think he would say, absolutely not to that, and a lame duck session would simply be unable to push that, short of maybe getting a six-month extension if cooler heads on both sides to prevail and address this. guest: it is impossible to tell. i don t know what president obama is willing for two. he wasn t willing to address reforming entitlements. he wasn t willing to do tax reform. he had four years. we would have embraced an opportunity to do fundamental tax reform. the president never provided any idea that he had any interest if that. i don t know, after an election, i don t think he is going to win but if he were to win, would he be willing to do that? i suppose it is possible but i could not predict that. neil: senator we will be
whether better is good for you or better is still bad for you. the administration can rightly claim the data is getting better. the problem is, that doesn t mean the data is good. by and large, it is not. at this stage of the recovery, we should be looking at three times massachusetts jobs created each and every mont mon. but white house is greater for meager advances, better than no advance at all. mitt romney says we shouldn t feel that way and we shouldn t be grateful. we should be mad. he says better is not good. it s bad. it s very bad. we shouldn t settle for so-so. we should aim for gung-ho. because we re not getting it, give the president the heave-ho. it s all about your perspective, isn t it? there was a time when no president worth his salt would brag about 7.8% unemployment rate. there was a time whenever prior month of president tenure that rate had never been lower. not good, but better. that is kind of where the
for supporting mitt romney, an african-american actress. she stood her ground and she doubled down on it and we will talk about that. neil: thank you, eric. and team obama is worried now about the win, and donor sources are talking, and wait until you hear what you are saying.
it will are horrendous, 14 of 17 economists now say it will put us in a recession and if new york times thinks this is going to be a slope, they are dreaming. that money will come out of their checks the first of the year. we will see a slow down. i suspect we are not only going to anticipate a recession you will see a recession. you check with honeywell or j.p. morgan, everyone can see it. neil: i am listening to james dime from j.p. morgan setting aside $200 million plus dollars preparing for the possibility this government could blow up on december 31. what do you think happen? what i hear from congressional folk on either side of the aisle, they get a six month suspension, cooler heads prevail for the new year, whether it is president romney or re-elected
i believe the polls are narrowing. i tell everyone the only poll i look at is the one on november 6. but it is closer here in pennsylvania than what i have seen in other polls that have been in the national media the last few days. neil: why is that? i noticed your state polls saying they have a huge swing and the president not long ago was up 15 points and another 12 points and then ten points but now to be even, that tells me, either a lost independents are coming out of the woodwork or a lot of the president s supporters are switching sides. what is it? guest: well, i think a lost his supporters who is voted for him four years ago, either are not going to vote, they have decided they will stand on the side line or will switch over to mitt romney in this election. traveling across pennsylvania i have talked to a lot of people, democrats and independents and republicans would last time