okay. we have reviewed the weaknesses of our position and have more to talk about. if we are up able to agree and reach a verdict, is the entire case mistried or is the single count mistried? i think that they didn t mean it exactly the way they said it, because it says if we are unable to agree and reach a verdict, which doesn t really make sense, but i think that i know what they mean, if they are unable to agree, is the entire case mistried or just that count, and i think that the instruction, well, the instruction doesn t really say that count, and i think that i said it, but i would repeat it again, and so my answer to them would be if you
On all charges, and that suggests along that rational line of thinking that they are coming back with a nancy, we are listening to the judge as they are coming back. i have a question for the record, and the question is that we have reviewed the weaknesses of our position, and we have more to talk about. if we are unable to agree, and i think that this means to reach a verdict instead of and is the entire case mistried or is the single count mistried? only the single count is mistried and not the entire case. if you have reached a verdict as to the other counts, they stand. and perhaps, if you look at the i see the pens already going, so i see where you guys are really very, very good. i read it, and i said the word count, and you noticed that, didn t you? you guys are something. you are correct that here in the
Bottom you are looking at the second to the last line where it says case and that is incorrect, and that is my fault, because it is only the count. so if you have ultimate ly reached a verdict that is one thing, and if you have ultimately not, then only that count is mistried. so if you need to delineate that, that is why i brought it out, because i suspected that you caught that. and if that answers your question, then you can return to the jury room and continue with your deliberations. thank you all very, very much. all right. any exceptions or objections to what was said to the jury from the state? yes, sir. from the defense? no, sir. mr. dunn? no, sir. well, that just solidifies that these folks are very
all right. we have verdicts in counts two, three, four and five. i have the verdict form in count one, there are no markings on it. but i will provide it to the clerk for the record. and based on the jury s inability to reach a verdict as to count one, i will declare that mistried, and we will talk about how we will proceed with regard to that in a moment. the other verdict forms are in order. i ll give them to the clerk for publishing. in the fourth judicial district, in case number 16, 2012, cf 01572, axxxma, division crd, the state of florida versus
A chance to talk. after you have done that, if you simply cannot reach a verdict, then return to the courtroom and i will declare this case mistried as to that count and will discharge you with my sincere appreciation for your services. thank you, ladies and gentlemen. you may now retire for further deliberations and we will provide you with a copy of this instruction. that was the judge down in duval county in jacksonville, florida. ashleigh banfield is now the host here on cnn and also wor d ed in session. she has been covering this on her show here at noon on cnn. i don t know about you, i am outraged. you re wanting to talk to me. what do you want to say? here s what i think people watching need to know. and i feel your pain, don, without question. if you were trying this case based on the headlines and the