Of many stripes. charlie is s of course the senator from missouri. he s going to say with theseor documents, thanks so much forth coming in for doing this . so this wasis aimed 10% mischaracterizes at our population. yeah, that s exactly right. it as it turns out, tucker ,ke the people that the bush administration thinks are the real threat to america, it s not the drugr, cartels. or it s notei foreign threats. it s you.ea it s the american people. t if you have questions about it, if you have questions about covid mask of questions about the koven vaccine, this administration wanted you to be monitored. you to this disinformation board was set up to bd go after you. that s what the documents say, by the way, election integrity, same storyry . the documents specifically mentioned that they needed to be a disinformation board because some people were having questions about election integrity. quessome people had questions aa january 6th. we couldn t have that .6th.t. and this board was
The president step down. of course, that answer, once again, he lies. mischaracterizes the article. the article didn t say he told colleagues he asked trump to resign but that he was going to do that. the recording confirms that. here s more of that january 10th, 2021, conversation between mccarthy and republican leaders, as mccarthy wasn t just expressing options. he was expressing his contempt, his disgust. just how much he despised donald trump. let me be very clear to all of you, and i am very clear to the president. he bears responsibilities for his words and actions, no ifs, ands, or buts. i asked him personally today, does he told responsibility for what happened? does he feel bad about what happened? he told me he does have some responsibility for what happened, and he needs to
However, whatever the senators want to, that s okay with me. they are going to be making a decision. whatever they want is okay with me. go ahead. that s enough, peter. go, please. say it? [inaudible] i think the press has treated me unbelievably unfairly. in fact, when i won that, i said the good thing is now the press finally gets hit. now they will finally treat me fairly. they got worse! they are worse now than ever! they are loco! but that s okay. i put up with it. go ahead. i use that word because of the fact that we made a deal with mexico. so no, please, sit down. go ahead. you re going to be next. reporter: i didn t know, i thought you re talking to reporting like i have two questions about judge kavanaugh. first, there are concerns they might have lied or mischaracterizes drinking while testifying. if they find that he did, do you think that bars him from being your supreme court nominee?
In the past. we should note most intelligence agents are honorable. there have been abuses. is it not possible this is something that should be looked at more? well, you have to keep in mind the context here. we have other members of congress and the minority who said that mischaracterizes what he testified to. andrew mccabe? yeah. we have the people releasing this memo voting not to release the competing memo by the other side. it doesn t really smack of an interest in transparency. they also recently voted on a number of issues related to fisa and other national security issues. over the years, there hasn t been a consistent concern about abuses by the fbi or the doj. it s very important that overall we look at issues to make sure that security apparatus aren t misused to spy on individual
Something that should be looked at more? well, you have to keep in mind the context here. we have other members of congress and the minority who said that mischaracterizes what he testified to. andrew mccabe? yeah. we have the people releasing this memo voting not to release the competing memo by the other side. it doesn t really smack of an interest in transparency. they also recently voted on a number of issues related to fisa and other national security issues. over the years, there hasn t been a consistent concern about abuses by the fbi or the doj. it s very important that overall we look at issues to make sure that security apparatus aren t misused to spy on individual citizens. but this doesn t seem like that. this is coming in the context of what s clearly a partisan attack on an ongoing investigation. can i just to add, we have to think about what it would have taken for this to be a