India, China cannot have normal relationship if there is transgression in border areas: Shringla
SECTIONS
Last Updated: Feb 17, 2021, 11:18 PM IST
Share
Synopsis
Addressing a meeting hosted by the Diplomatic Academy of Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Shringla also said that the relationship between the two Asian giants is definitely dependent on the normal situation at the border.
PTI In the last few days we have started disengagement at border and have come to disengagement after nine months of engagements, Shringla said.
MOSCOW: India s relationship with China is complex and the two countries cannot have a normal bilateral relationship if there is transgression in the border areas, Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla said here on Wednesday.
Morning Brief (ET Bureau)
Indulekha Aravind | 28:40 Min | February 16, 2021, 8:00 AM IST
China and India seem to be moving towards military disengagement at the LAC after a standoff lasting months. Nirupama Rao, former Indian foreign secretary, and ET s Pranab Dhal Samanta tell us what led to this development, whether India can trust China and the impact on bilateral trade relations.
Tags
there to talk to him about getting the military out, but we re going to see a long program of destabilization to keep ukraine from moving too far west and he s determined to do it and at the same time it s clear the ukrainians most of them want to move west and there s a long way to go with this and he s got a lot of instruments in his power and he s threatened also to keep the military pressure on if need be. and carl, is it clear what the white house s next move is? i think, yes. that what you re hearing now about the off ramp to get some military disengagement, as much calm as possible. but there are no allusions in the white house. putin is going to somehow fold up his tent and take all the non-military tools in his tent and put them aside. he is going to fight this thing to the last because, look. he can t have a russian empire
that what you re hearing now about the off ramp to get some military disengagement, as much calm as possible. but there are no allusions in the white house. putin is going to somehow fold up his tent and take all the non-military tools in his tent and put them aside. he is going to fight this thing to the last because, look. he can t have a russian empire without ukraine. he can t have it with just armenia and uzbekistan or something like that. as fareed says, ukraine is essential. kiev, the gates of kiev, historically essential to the russian vision of its own people and he is nothing else, you know, a russian believer in itself destiny, its history and he is there to restore it after the fall of the soviet empire and he s called the great tragedy of the 20th century and he s not walking away from this and, yeah. he s clever like a fox as
program of destabilization to keep ukraine from moving too far west and he s determined to do it and at the same time it s clear the ukrainians most of them want to move west and there s a long way to go with this and he s got a lot of instruments in his power and he s threatened also to keep the military pressure on if need be. and carl, is it clear what the white house s next move is? i think, yes. that what you re hearing now about the off ramp to get some military disengagement, as much calm as possible. but there are no allusions in the white house that putin is going to somehow fold up his tent and take all the non-military tools in his tent and put them aside. he is going to fight this thing to the last because, look. he can t have a russian empire without ukraine. he can t have it with just