presumably that s all he can do, it s procedural for presumably that s all he can do, it s proceduralfor him, it s not for him to substitute his judgment but that of the politician. 0n djokovic aside, is there an argument they are still that they can realistically make about how he s being treated? being treated? they can. for example. being treated? they can. for example. the being treated? they can. for example, the government i being treated? they can. for example, the government is| being treated? they can. for - example, the government is saying there is a risk of public health, it s in the public interest to deal with that in this way. they can argue that that s in a rational approach. in fact acting for djokovic last night made that point that to make essentially what this minister is saying is that we don t want you here because it might stir up want you here because it might stir up anti factors put up might say that the government is for the mib rational, it might be