Not aware of this because the media began telling a different story about what happened. The washington post, for example, explained the radical left wasnt actually to blame for the capitol bombings. Instead the culprit was far more general, something called the easy contagion of extremism in a time of dark frustrations and deep disillusionment, whatever that means. It meant there was the republican president at the time. The bombers remained welcomed in polite society. One became a professor at a prestigious american university, if you can imagine. Even now, 50 years after the fact, the whitewash of that day continues. Politico just ran a long piece telling us the real villain in the 1971 Terror Attack on the capitol was richard nixon, who was not there, but according to politico, the bombing, quote, supercharged nixons paranoia in the end led to watergate. The story ended this way. 50 years on, it seems remarkable how fast the 1971 attacks faded from collective memory. Oh, is it rema
Impeachment hearings earlier this year. take a look at this. it s surveillance footage showing a squad of people dressed in all black, systematically entering the capitol and kicking open one of the exterior doors on the senate side. these people seem to be well trained and coordinated. they re not high on mushrooms. who are they? why don t we know their names? why aren t they dressed like any of the other people in the footage just released. remember, we were attacked by saying this, but we ve already been vindicated for it. we still don t know how many federal agents were involved in the event that day on january 6. but we have very good reason to believe from court documents that it s a significant number. and here s one clue. at a recent rally in washington, the feds managed to arrest one of their own undercover agents. there were so many feds at the event that they lost track of each other and arrested one of them. so, we ask once again. how many federal agents were
You remember the lies again and again about the mcclos keyes in st. louis or the covington kids who were also wide supremacists. remember how they claimed that george floyd was choked to death even though he was not and had a fatal load of fentanyl in his system and zero signs of intoxication? that s what it said. we re not making it up. medical reports don t matter? that s true. lap tops showed hunter biden was selling access to his father for years but no, it s not real. super spreader event and spreading russian disinformation. disinformation he knows to be fabricated and supplied by a foreign intelligence service and despite the warning, he s still doing it. you have said this entire thing is so obviously a russian plot. it s sort of a crazy quilt at this point. which has all of the hallmarks of russian disinformation. it wasn t for lack of trying.
In fact, like them even more because they believe they re on the right side. so you have huge numbers of journalists who believe they have the right to lie and even when they get caught, they don t care because they know their audience won t hold it against them. tucker carlson: you came on, i think, immediately after you left the intercept. and i thought it was said then, looking back on it, the media outlet that you founded tried to make you lie or prevented you from telling the truth. i mean, that just really sums up the moment we re living in. i m sorry you went through that. awful in every way. you re thriving, obviously. glen greenwald, thank you. yeah, thanks, tucker. tucker carlson: so, how is our immigration system going? well well haigs trying to get into the country are biting i.c.e. agents. we should be a rule, we should not import people who bite, period, that s got to be a deal killer. is it in the constitution, no? is it a federal law, no? but it s common sense
Actually happened? and how can we find out? how can we make up our minds for ourselves? it s a significant day in american history. it s being used to change the country. we should getting to the actual facts of that day. what are they? it turns out the biden administration didn t want to tell us what they were. they refused to release thousands of hours of surveillance footage taken within the capitol on january 6. why don t they want us to see that? they really didn t want us to see it. they went to court to keep that footage under seal. in one court document, the department of justice argued that releasing that footage on january 6 would, we re quoting here, compromise the security of the united states capitol and those who work there. they went on to say that footage might create a visual pathway where other bad actors could use in planning their breach point and pathway for future attacks. no word if isis-k was involved or if isis k exists. but that s not the point. the point is t