count 2, entightment. there you see it, not guilty, but guilty of the conspiracy to entice. you don t need to find the defendant guilty of the underlying crime to find them guilty of agreeing to commit that crime. conspiracy is called an incomplete crime. but they may have concluded that number one, jane, the accuser who testified, they may have found her not credible for whatever reason, or they may have found the enticement was ontario incidental. the intent was only incidental to the sexual assault. that maxwell didn t have the specific intent to entice her for the purpose of kmigt a sex crime. so that could have been what they struggled with as well in finding her not guilty of count 2, but guilty on every other count. unsurprisingly, maxwell s attorneys say they ll appeal. what strategy do you think they ll use in the future legal matters here? the most common appeal would be something like jury