[inaudible] go figure. level of the attacks only get worse to will only get worse. i fear that they will be able to pull off a significant attack that has real financial consequences. if you just take the public information by private security companies, we know that nationstates have been on our critical infrastructure truth they are waiting to cost-effective capabilities in case of a conflict. we have a penetrative it. we know they were successful. we know they were successful on getting into our financial networks, large financial institutions, not once, but twice. is somebody at some point is going to decide to flip the switch. when they do, we will have a significant economic, catastrophic event. actuallys we are just fat guys. that is a losing equation from always. i fear it would take something like that to get most members of congress to understand the real threat. that i will say stop the nsa spying on you. because they don t silently. because they don t spy on
revelations of last year. of those 60%, 39% of those had taken active steps to improve the security of their privacy of communications online. and it was interesting how the media interpreted this. because they said, well, this is a minority. people must not care that much. nobody is really making changes. but when you re actually doing of ath on what 39% of 60% the world s global internet users is, that s 702 million people around the world who are now safer today than they were just a year and a half ago. and this is i think really where we begin to see the framework of how we can move forward in the absence of political reform, in the absence of legal reform, and this is good. because what we ve seen politically around the world hroughout the development in history is that politics is about power. when you have people in great power positions, when you have super states, they will not cede any sort of authority that they ve claimed back to the public, back to civil society
i think both broad and domestically they are not going to forecast what we are going to be going through as we are traveling home to see loved ones but we are on high alert. mostly abroad. i think there was significant concerns in thailand, pakistan but, that s the world we re living in. wonder, but at some point that is part of it but when will the enhanced threat end. this is something for the long term. . well, thank you both for being . tomorrow, a federal budget analysis. that will be part of the discussion hosted by the brookings institution. that is live at 9:30 a.m. eastern on c-span three. . 3. we were also have live coverage it later in the day from the economic club of washington dc. that is live at 7:00 here on .-span next, edward snowden talks about government surveillance. he also discusses the recent senate report. this is from a conference on privacy and civil liberties posted by the cato institute. this is one hour. while we arrange for him
won t happen. really if the people rule, if the democratic system is answerable enough, if it does not have all of these levers and barriers to the people s will being stressed, it will express the public will, and that will mean it is a legitimate system of government. paine asserted. i think jefferson was more careful about this. it will also mean the people comply to be governed with the technical capacity society. one of the fascinating things is this combination of democracy with a technocrat government. the early progressives there were many more mechanisms for direct democracy. people should be able to make their views known through referenda, they should be arresting jesses justices, the constitutional system, i think it is fair to say, is opposed to both of these. it does not trust the people. the constitution does not trust anybody. let s assume everybody is wrong. what does a legitimate government look like then? i think that is one of the best things about t
house. 2-2, this is the subway intermission report. perhaps one of the faces you re liam mchugh, alongside mike milbury and keith jones. seeing now will determine if the kings lead 3-1 former that s the deal or whether it is ranger, marian gaborik, 14th of the postseason, means it ot is presented tonight. on the way. what is your take away so far? the rangers fell back into the same formula they had at kopitar and stepan to begin it. madison square garden in game four, it work worked for them then. tonight, the kings tie it up. i think they have to go try to doughty with the first chase a go earning don t you? away from kreider. yes. a different approach here in punched on back wide of kreider, this game, rather than game four. stepping to it is muzzin. i just can t believe they sat flipped the other way, rifled on back like they did. and then right back again and le, when you think then hoisted along further by the pressure that lundqvist was gaborik and sent around b