supremacy clause. mark meadows removal thing, chris, it s a test balloon, if you may, because if mark meadows can get the case removed a federal court on the grounds that he s a federal official and if he can sustain a dismissal, which i can tell you right now chris, is not gonna happen on a monday, then perhaps, as we have seen, people like david schaffer and jeffrey clark, they ve also filed notices of removal, they re also codefendants with donald trump here in fulton county. they have also filed notices and we re going to see, and evidently, john eastman, sydney powell, a whole lot of people try that theory out. of course david schaffer was not a federal official. he s actually test ballooning his own bizarre theory. he says as a contingent elector, presidential elector, i am afforded the protections that we give it to me under the constitution. so there s a lot that that play. the last thing i ll tell you, chris, very quickly, is that an evidentiary hearing is dangerous for any de
chris, they ve been on notice. that indictment was unsealed late medina last week. to mark meadows s credit, i put that in quotes, he did move expeditiously to file a notice of removal. our viewers are aware that on this coming monday, august 28th at 10 am, a federal judge in the northern district of georgia will conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether or not mark meadows s claim of removal, because he was a federal official at the time of the conduct alleged in the indictment, that he is entitled to the removal of his case from state court into federal court. mark meadows also is making a move to dismiss all charges, saving running the gamut from due process, as well as the supremacy clause. mark meadows removal thing, chris, it s a test balloon, if you may, because if mark meadows can get the case removed a federal court on the grounds that he s a federal official and if he can sustain a dismissal, which i can tell you right now chris, is not gonna happen on a monday, the