Getting to the, i want to return to absolute immunity of mark meadows filing, because i want to understand, when meadows and trump say absolute immunity, they re saying the law can t touch them. they can do what they want as president and chief of staff. i renata about this 25 years ago. this is a totally bogus theory. unfortunately for mark meadows, i have not been able to find the federal law or constitutional provision that makes in the very awful election part of the job at the white house. it is ridiculous. meadows was acting as some protector of election integrity. he was acting to protect his boss and tried to get the results don t out. and that way, he is similar to nixon s chief of staff. it s not just meadows. trump today was tweeting basically that he has absolute immunity according to some constitutional scholar, which is probably ridiculous.
Trump to declassify documents, as soon as he took them to the white house residence or anywhere else. he was not involved in the packing at the boxes that went to mar-a-lago. he knows nothing about the classifying anything involved in that case. what do you make of what that does and how that might impact the documents case in florida against donald trump? he s got to get to the terms of the defense, and before getting to the, i want to return to absolute immunity of mark meadows filing, because i want to understand, when meadows and trump say absolute immunity, they re saying the law can t touch them. they can do what they want as president and chief of staff. i renata about this 25 years ago. this is a totally bogus theory. unfortunately for mark meadows, i have not been able to find