Include possible coconspirators. What youre watching is the cover of that page of the indictment if we can put that up on the screen. That would be great. Here with more, we go back to Law Professor and fox news computer jonathan turley. Jonathan, im looking at that. If youre looking at the document that made it to the media talking about ten specific indictments. How do you read it as your background as the great Law Professor that you are . Youre talking about ten indictments, it has not profile of a racketeering case. Thats where willis gained her fame as a local prosecutor. You often will have large numbers of people linked in a conspiracy. To make out that case you have to esta conspirators. Few crimes are on a predicate crime list, the basis for racketeering charges. In this case theyre likely to use crimes like fraud and combine all these ago force in a large comprehensive conspiracy. Thats the most likely thing here. The problem is not that racket, the rico statutes were design
indictment. they sat around you could have done this with a handful of first year law students and they said what s the wides range of things that will help us smear donald trump. they threw them all together. the classic story that you can get a ham sandwich indicted by a grand jury because the power of the prosecutor coming in with no defense attorneys no rules of evidence no cross-examination. so, you know, this is a rigged deal. everybody knows that. but what i m struck with tonight, sean, and i don t want to make too much of this but i think it s interesting just as what you saw the other day with the appointment of weiss as special counsel who is just incompetent, made no sense. mr. speaker if i can interrupt you again. we have more news. parently mark meadows and mark east man have been indicted as well. literally i m opening up what looks like an indictment. can i ask the people in the control room, are you sure this isn t from earlier today?