With the findings in the horowitz report. Horrow its seems to be giving the fbi that part of the investigation saying its a clean bill. They had enough reason to do this investigation. Everybody who was interviewed cements to indicate they did not open an investigation. Evan perez, thank you so much. Joining our panel now, we have with us jim bakker. You are not singled out the report makes clear the fbi failed when it came to the administering the fisa warrants, too much was left out or not presented to the court. Do you accept what the Inspector General is saying . I am there are two big groups of conclusions, one is, it was not a politically motivated
investigation and it was properly predicated with us goingforward with that investigation. It was malpractice for us not to open this investigation. All of the statements that it was a hoax are wrong. The investigation was not a coup or a coup attempt. Having said that, he does point out many mistakes that were made with respect to err
energy and that is a privileged conversation. now when the majority subpoenas those witnesses and the president refused to deliver the relevant documents they are charging him with an article of impeachment for obstruction. in fact, their report says the president obstructed the impeachment inquiry by instructing witnesses to ignore subpoenas. why? the gentleman s time is expired. miss bass. mr. goldman, i want to pick up on the president using the powers of his office. in this case in a meeting at the white house to pressure a foreign country to investigate his political rival. now that you ve had time to step back from the investigation, is there any doubt that the president did, in fact, use a white house visit to pressure president zelensky to announce investigations of his political rival to benefit his reelection campaign? i will answer that question in a minute but i would like just to comment to mr. buck that the majority staff and no one