a conspiracy or are part of the rico indictment like we see here, they can be charged. it will be up to a jury based on evidence from both sides, but particularly the d.a., to demonstrate how far across the ethical line or criminal line any of the lawyers that have been charged actually went. so she bears the burden of proof, but i think you heard from her the confidence that she has in the evidence to demonstrate that these were not within the bounds of zealously representing a client. these acts crossed a line. therefore, the defendants should be held accountable for that. elliot? i would say the same thing. i think we can t understate the point that lawyers it s important for lawyers to be able to provide their clients with zealous advocacy in a secret one-on-one relationship where they are providing good advice to people in a time of need. that does not sbentitle attorne
of their official canvas all of the votes from 11 precincts where they grandfather clause, a jim crow era law to disenfranchise black citizens hadn t been zealously in force. the result was to drop some 1200 votes, mainly cast by black and native citizens. the conspiracy led to a narrow loss by a house candidate that should ve rightfully one. the law has been used to punish all kinds of intimidation since then, according to the washington post, including to prosecute members of the kkk that carried out the 1964 freedom summer murders as well is the 99 who oversaw the burning of a cross in the front yard of a puerto rican man and his mexican wife. there s even people waiting to be statute this fall. back in march, a trump supporter named douglas mackie was convicted of using twitter to disappearance disenfranchise voters in the 2016 election with the help of russian troll farm s. spreading misinformation about voting, posting tweets like this one targeting people of
where they grandfather clause, a jim crow era law to disenfranchise black citizens hadn t been zealously in force. the result was to drop some 1200 votes, mainly cast by black and native citizens. the conspiracy led to a narrow loss by a house candidate that should ve rightfully one. the law has been used to punish all kinds of intimidation since then, according to the washington post, including to prosecute members of the kkk that carried out the 1964 freedom summer murders as well is the 99 who oversaw the burning of a cross in the front yard of a puerto rican man and his mexican wife. there s even people waiting to be statute this fall. back in march, a trump supporter named douglas mackie was convicted of using twitter to disappearance disenfranchise voters in the 2016 election with the help of russian troll farm s. spreading misinformation about voting, posting tweets like this one targeting people of color who supported hillary
Dr. Frederick Stutz's Evangelization Guide for College Campuses Soon to Exhibit at San Diego Union-Tribune Festival of Books webwire.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from webwire.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
passage of time. so the reason you know that they haven t cooperated is because they re charged. so in other words, if they had cooperated, we would see a different kind of charge or something different? well, there are few indications of cooperation here. one is the delay where de oliveira supposedly lied and now when he gets charged. why wasn t he charged initially in the original indictment? almost certainly the special counsel was trying to flip him and failed to do so. harry, what can prosecutors do when two defendants are being bankrolled basically, or their attorneys fees are being bankrolled by another defendant, in this case, donald trump s political pac? what can prosecutors do to help make them cooperate? hope that they see reason. you know, there s no brass knuckles here, but they talked to the lawyers. they are duty-bound to represent their client zealously and just