the offender s views are deemed to be a danger to the communist state, a real danger, they ll be arrested and if released, their passports confiscated, well, that s what they did. remember that poor cardinal joseph zen and hong kong the reflex to silence opposition voices in a totalitarian state is one thing. but now it s also the impulsevo ofic democrats here with a november blowout looming and a party on the ropes, they reem acting more like president. gee, than president kennedy or bill clinton. they rent their new motto seems to be ifms you can t beat them, use your corporate shills to. censor them. with somem. horrific shooting or a protestro that goes wrong. and if the facts line up just right for them, they tagh republicans for it and they did that . of course, at this weekend s horrific attack in buffalo by ab horrific attack in buffalo by ab platforms that need to be monitored and shut down the second these words arehese espoused out there in theseow platforms, it ha
kramer: take one! jerrrry: no! krkramer stop p it! jajason alexanander: and boom, ththere you gogo, a situtuation comemedy. sheldodon: bazingaga! tim allelen: this twtwenty -t-three minututes of magic. lucycy: it s soo tasty, too! tracy morgan: you fell in love with these characters. arnold: whwhat chu talkin about willllis? geri jewell: we need to laugh at ourselves. joey: yoyou hide my y clothe, i m wearining everything you ow. constance e wu: lalaughter o opens you u u. haley:y: okay ready? sururpri! [screamingng and chaosos] mara b brock akil:l: the thinings that wewe might bee afraid to o talk aboutut. bobow: some pepeople thatt were supposed to protectct us d didn t do the right t thing. tim reid: like racism. son: so ththe cops are the babad guys? dre: yeses. bow: n no. kim m fields: clclass wars ralplph: money!! i m a a millionairire. dadan levy: anand gender diverersity. sarah:h: dad? mamaura: hi girls.s. ted dansnson: you cacan reach id rereally touchch people s
Know, crazy. horrible. yes. and whensaou i said what is this that my son did, he said he didn t use the right pronouns and i just i couldn t believe it. i was appalled. he told me i d be receiving a letter and an email with a letter and i received the email and the letter was nothing more than a standard letter with a blurb that said sexual harassment for not using proper pronouns, no detail, nothing.or noww i want to read a part ofe the letter rose and your lawyer lukken responder the following allegations that potential potentially tha constitute sexual harassment after being informed that a student s preferred pronouns were they then redacted name engaged in conduct based on gender identity toward the student including using incorrect pronouns and conduct conduct that was harassing in nature. lukeke