process. he lost in the district court. 3-0 lost in the court of appeals. lost 8-1 today in the supreme court. it s 12-1. of those 12 justices that ruled against donald trump, five of them are republican appointees, conservative justices, three of them of course are donald trump s own nominated justices. it tells me this is an issue so clear cut it transcends politics and ideology. sometimes right is just right in the law. could all these documents lead to even more requests from the committee and more subpoenas to witnesses? absolutely. that s the nature of any investigation. one lead leads to another. that s why they re called leads. you pull on one thread, sometimes you can unravel the whole sweater. if they have these documents at this moment if i was on the committee i would have sent somebody to the archives at 6:30 when the documents came out. they will be going through them in the hours and days and you always have to follow up.
inimpressed by that answer and you see that in the ruling. only justice clarence thomas said publicly, you know, that he would have supported the former president s request to block the documents. what does that tell but the rest of the court? well, it tells me first of all, donald trump got absolutely annihi annihilate throughout this process. he lost in the district court. 3-0 lost in the court of appeals. lost 8-1 today in the supreme court. it s 1,2001 of those 12 justices that ruled against donald trump, five of them are republican appointees, conservative justices, three of them of course are donald trump s own nominated justices. it tells me this is an issue so clear cut it transcends politics and ideology. sometimes right is just right in the law. could all these documents lead to even more requests from the committee and more subpoenas to witnesses? absolutely. that s the nature of any