[cheers and applause] greg: happy wednesday, everybody. so don t look now but the metoo movement is back but this time what s being attacked isn t women but academic integrity and once again we look to harvard. the devri in the east. you don t know who that is. trust me it worked in the meeting. he s just been accused of roughly 40 instances of plagiarism in her ph.d. dissertation and in a single academic paper she published in her career. there will be more accusations of plagiarism but she was too lazy to write more than one fake paper. which digs the question, when was the last person to have an original idea at harvard? john adams, al gore, barack obama. he must be sweating, he just ate a real spicy dog. charleston s husband is also a professor, and according to reports her one publication even ripped off the research that he did back in 2012. wait. a woman bringing up something her husband did years ago? that s not plagiarism. that s marriage. a sexist would say
steve: thank you very much, todd. 6:00 a.m. on the east coast. last day of dry january, januar. it s been a long month, folks. welcome to fox & friends. fox news alert. overnight, impeachment tar heels against dhs secretary mayorkas have moved ahead in the house. carley: as cities reel from the border crisis, lawrence is in denver and spoke exclusively with the democrat mayor there. every hotel room we have in the city of denver is full. we are at 5,000 people in shelter and we have more coming every day. i think our city is very close to its breaking point now. brian: an 11-year-old is safe this morning after terrifying footage shows her escaping an attempted kidnapper. look at this. fox & friends starts right now. and, remember, your mornings are better because you have chosen to be with friends, meaning us. watch. all right a fox news alert on this wednesday morning. the house homeland security committee yesterday advanced articles of impeachment against
this is outnumbered, i m emily compagno here with my co-host kayleigh mcenany and harris faulkner. also joining us culture plus group co-founder and ceo lili gil valletta and author of cancel culture dictionary, guide to winning the war on fun, jimmy failla. we begin with disturbing story out of new york city. police officers were beaten by a violent mob of migrants. this horrifying video shows the moment the attackers pounded two nypd officers who were trying to break up a mob in time square. they tried to arrest one individual, the mob attacked, pushing and punching the officers. you can see one suspect kicking an officer in the face while he is on the ground. one officer suffered a cut to his face, while the other sustained body bruises. five of the suspects were arrested later that night and face charges for assaulting a police officer and more. with police sources telling fox one man has two open assault and robbery charges. to add inassault to injury, at least four
how accurate that is, how come they are fighting so hard to keep that information from us when we ask for it? why won t they share it? i m james clayton, and i m investigating whether the police should be using this controversial tech. the technology itself is harmful. it is too dangerous and that is just a massive threat to civil liberties in this nation. march, 2017. andrew conlyn is driving with a friend. i think we made about 1.5 miles into a 30 mile trip. andrew is in the front passenger seat, his friend is driving. and he s probably hitting 80, 90. i m saying, you know, slow down . it was falling on deaf ears i don t think he responded at all so i basically reached the conclusion that somebody was going to die that night. sirens wail does your fire extinguisher work? it s out? i used it all up - i can t put the fire out. sirens wail watch out. the car has hit a tree. the driver was thrown into bushes nearby. he died from his injuries. i m very fortunate to have w
now on bbc news, our world: facial recognition fighting crime? across america, police are increasingly using facial recognition technology to fight crime. speaks spanish. can you open the door? you want law enforcement to have more tools at our disposal, not less. images can be fed into a database to search for matches and track people down but critics argue the use of this technology is opaque and could be inaccurate. if law enforcement knows how accurate that is, how come they are fighting so hard to keep that information from us when we ask for it? why won t they share it? i m james clayton and i m investigating whether the police should be using this controversial tech. the technology itself is harmful. it is too dangerous and that is just a massive threat to civil liberties in this nation. march, 2017. andrew conlyn is driving with a friend. i think we made about 1.5 miles into a 30 mile trip. andrew is in the front passenger seat, his friend is driving. and he s proba