Have said this. i had stayed quiet for years hoping it would fade away. but instead it got worse. i decided to take my power back. evan, what else is page saying? well, you know, kate she says a lot about what the effect of being attacked by the president and his tweets. this is looked at by the attorney general and between lisa page and lisa strzok. both of them are working on this hillary clinton e-mail investigation. what was found, despite of those text messages which they disparage then candidate trump, they found they had no effect on the investigation itself. i will read you part of the interview where she talks about the effect of being attacked by the president of the united
Conduct and behavior. recently leveraged his status as a former high ranking official with access of highly serious information. as part of this review, i am evaluating action with respect to the following individuals. james clapper, james comey, michael hay den, sally yates, lisa strzok. dan coats was left out of the loop on today s announcement as were other senior intelligence officials. as for brennan that he actively abused security hereclearance, white house declined to provide any. as was alleged earlier. i have laid out the reasons
Information. as part of this review, i am evaluating action with respect to the following individuals. james clapper, james comey, michael hay den, sally yates, lisa strzok. dan coats was left out of the loop on today s announcement as were other senior intelligence officials. as for brennan that he actively abused security clearance, the white house declined to provide any. as was alleged earlier. i have laid out the reasons for the decisions that was made on this specific instance and we ll continue to review the other accuracies.
Witch hunt on collusion. strzok refused to answer what this text is referring to. lisa page, behind closed doors, did in fact confirmed that the text refer to the quality of the russia case that he was leading. there is no big they re there. there never was. millions of dollars later, this never ending divide and fishing expedition rolls on. show us the evidence, mr. miller why don t you ever appoint a guy that has that much corruption in his background. really? withholding evidence? sending innocent people to jail for a year, overturned by the fifth circuit? tens of thousands of americans lost their job? he is your number one guy? really? then you can t find a single republican to put on your team? not one? just a merry band of hillary supporters? here was more from the hill is
Crime found. i think that s essential because it is 1 of 5 things they did not defy the normal investigative work that they do. sean: on top of that, they were writing an exoneration of hillary before they investigated. let s go back to this. lisa page, the media only focuses on one story at a time, and it s a story that they have focused on for two years with no evidence, my question is, lisa strzok i m sorry, lisa page is contradicting what peter strzok said under oath. that means he lied under oath if she is telling us what it seems like it reads is what they meant, which he denies. the most important thing is that peter strzok testified, he didn t believe any political bias affected his action. he s giving a factual statement, yeah, we were talking about russia, we are talking about the special counsel. we now know for sure that was what they were talking about. most important thing going on, let s take a look at the five things that we now know they did that defy their train