The georgia case is for a lot of these we need translators, former prosecutors. What fani willis charged was the clearest thing we all saw with our own eyes. And i had this conversation in the 8 00 hour. What trump told his voters his first year as president in 2017 from a podium was dont believe what you see, dont believe what you hear, only believe me. And what fani willis indicted yesterday just blows that out of the water. In state court we could see with our own eyes. And my understanding again, youre the lawyer in these conversations was that if this, then that. So if this criminal enterprise with us corrupt in nature and all in pursuance of a crime, then all of these acts were a part of it and all these people were a part of it. From the outside having worked in politics, thats what it looked like to me. So, to read that narrative is what made that indictment, the fourth in just a few short months, different from the others. I agree. I think you put that very well. Sometimes we
consider we dug this up from a government hearing over 70 years ago, soit s not perfect video. if you listen closely, you ll start to understand why they developed these laws to do what witnesses and others were resisting. during this period of your close friendship, he hired benny the bug ross. he hires a liquor bootleger, he got a charter. i cannot remember whether he was or not, as i said. i just don t recall. can t remember what you talked about and can t remember whether he was there? i can t remember anything of any importance, mr. kennedy. i can t recall it. that was the dodging, congress punched back. by 1970, they passed this rico law as a way to go after all of the mobsters together. everyone s crime is shared. this is a broad law. now, some argue that when you