he emerged today, of course, refusing to take any questionse to defend his department s actions. visa v former president.ia my role is completelysp consistenteak on with regulatios that set forth the responsibilities of , e attorney general underco the special counsel regulations, and i followed thos te regulations. lau look, let sra be very clear here. the issue is are you acting in good faith or? are you part of a political operation to get a conviction 81% mp by any means necessary? 81% of republicans believeof reb about all you know. this is all about politics and protecting one of the more destructivvee presidentsha the united states has ever had. joe biden. and they rjoe bide e now consider the situation this way. no one believes that merrick garland would still be a a.g. if he didn t hadn t greenlitlig a special prosecutor. this case, everyone at msnbc and cnn believes that garland tu is trying to put trump in jailt. no matter where the facts lead. otherwise they
like epstein. then when it s you when you were at the january 6 rally rioting and wearing that big giant bunny viking hat everybody caught you jesse. that s because i m an fbi informant. that s why. i haven t been questioned. imagine if the view is around in the 90s they would probably say o.j. was innocent. i could see them saying court tv is weaponizing the murders against o.j. simpson. it was probably cato. are you tired of the word weaponizing? yes. can we stop that? i don t understand what it means but if this was the trump white house we would still have fun with the story and we would say stephen miller was a person of interest because he was skinny and fidgetedy and that mucho was a person of interest. but look at the lengths the government goes to knock these things down spending two years
cameras these unsolved mysteries only go no one direction? like epstein. then when it s you when you were at the january 6 rally rioting and wearing that big giant bunny viking hat everybody caught you jesse. that s because i m an fbi informant. that s why. i haven t been questioned. imagine if the view is around in the 90s they would probably say o.j. was innocent. i could see them saying court tv is weaponizing the murders against o.j. simpson. it was probably cato. are you tired of the word weaponizing? yes. can we stop that? i don t understand what it means but if this was the trump white house we would still have fun with the story and we would say stephen miller was a person of interest because he was skinny and fidgetedy and that mucho was a person of interest.
what s in that letter and what do you expect to hear from him at this point? im jor well, jim jordan and i hadda a chance to to interview the gunterviewy who was in charf the d.c. field office, who was in charge of finding out who thisof findi o pipe bomber . and it turns out we re 900 days later, they don t havethings a suspect. and i think one of the biggest things that i learned in i t interview with him was that the phone data was corrupted. hesi asked him, i said, so, you know, we saw on the video the suspect the night before who you think planted the bomb. we saw them use a phone a fewe n times. how did you use the phone data? and he said basicalle data y, this. you re not going to believe this. he even use the word conspiracy theory. he didn t want to tell us because he thought it would fuel more conspiracy theories that they went to the phone providers and the datae provid corrupted. he, like epstein s camera, was not working right in cell phone. observe something now. now w
Who Succeeded Robert & Kevin Maxwell (& Why The Tetris Movie Avoids Telling You) screenrant.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from screenrant.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.