he did drive his truck. he did help to corner ahmaud arbery. he was part of this awful, terrible, oppressive picture that cornered and, as to use the words of travis mcmichael, that chased him down like a rat. and, so, he was part of the chasing down like a rat. so he can t really run away from that. he didn t pull the trigger. he didn t do perhaps as much as the mcmichaels did, but he was part of the picture. and without his involvement there may not have been the same outcome. i think that s what s critical. so he might get less charges. but i think if the jury is going to convict the mcmichaels, then i think mr. bryan will get convicted perhaps to a lessor degree, but he will still get convicted. let s go through all the felony counts. remember, there are nine counts. all men are charged. there is malice murder. felony murder, four counts of that. aggravated assault, two counts of that. false imprisonment and criminal
here s another one. al qaeda in the arabian peninsula. a raid in yemen. things went wrong. a navy s.e.a.l. was killed. there was a statement, 11-minute audio recording. i ll read this part. the new fool of the white house received a painful slap across his face. now, throughout the george w. bush administration, to a lessor degree in the obama administration, we have had bin laden and donald trump is someone who reflectively reacts. what do we think? well, i think we see the perils of that and it s true across the board on the domestic policy for sure and constantly responding with his comments about the judge in seattle who issued the ruling were completely out of step with what a president normally would do but when it is, as jeff said, on the foreign stage when you re
election would have been different. but that doesn t change the fact that the russians and others, chinese to a lessor degree, have been able to interfere with our electoral process, whether how serious it is and how whether it would have affected the outcome of the election or not is the reason why we need to have a select committee. jake, the responsibilities for cyber is spread over about four different committees in the senate and each doing their own thing, frankly, is not going to be the most efficient way of arriving at a conclusion. this is serious business. if they re able to harm the electoral process, then they destroy dmek rasy, which is faced on free and fair elections. before you go, sir, if a democrat were in the same position as donald trump right now, the democrat had been
all, how the court is going to rule on these two cases, the defense of marriage act and proposition 8, it depends on how they rule. it can either galvanize supporters or go against it. the economy is so slow to come back right now. it s hard to imagine that voters are really going to care about this issue as deeply as they did, for example, in 2004, when they are worried about paying for things like their mortgage 689 i think 2016 will be much more fascinating into how the public views this issue. if you look at the eight years from 2008 to 2016, how much the democratic party and even to a lessor degree the republican party has changed on the issue, you had three of the top candidates support civil unions, three of the top democratic unions. 2008 have completely come out for gay marriage. it s going to be interesting. i wouldn t be surprised if you saw top candidates come out and make a states rights argument,