That same approach at the jan 6th committee. took until yesterday i want to read some of his defense we have for the first time. we didn t have that before. he talks about being on the infamous call with the georgia elections official and says that it was really about trying to find a, quote, less litigious resolution of the trump campaign against the state. what do you think of this sudden change or ability to testify? one of the things the legal process does is push people to speak to truth and explain themselves, because they re facing really serious consequences. so i think what you re seeing here is mark meadows is that the incentives have realigned. now he s trying to argue that he should be tried or his case should be heard in federal court because what he was doing was part of official government duties, and that would give him the right to remove the case to federal court. there s a complicated question about whether if a judge rules