In this johnson and koh who we have just met in this building. that is not acceptable or tolerable and should not go acceptable or tolerable and should not go on acceptable or tolerable and should not go on the one day longer. we are determined, not go on the one day longer. we are determined, very determined to be in the executive, determined to tell people the executive, determined to tell people as the executive, determined to tell people as we promised the whole way through people as we promised the whole way through the election. it is now time to get through the election. it is now time to get into through the election. it is now time to get into that executive and do business to get into that executive and do business and actually respond to the public s business and actually respond to the public s needs. what borisjohnson is sponsoring in the dup is nonsense and it is sponsoring in the dup is nonsense and it is is sponsoring in the dup is nonsense and it i
And stormont can get up and running again after that meeting with boris i again after that meeting with boris johnson again after that meeting with boris johnson. secondly, again after that meeting with boris johnson. secondly, are again after that meeting with boris johnson. secondly, are you - again after that meeting with boris - johnson. secondly, are you committed to power-sharing johnson. secondly, are you committed to power sharing even johnson. secondly, are you committed to power sharing even if johnson. secondly, are you committed to power sharing even if the johnson. secondly, are you committed to power sharing even if the prime - to power sharing even if the prime minister to power sharing even if the prime minister overrides to power sharing even if the prime minister overrides the to power sharing even if the prime minister overrides the protocol? i minister overrides the protocol? would minister overrides the protocol? would you minister overrides the
Would be an attempt to legislate, to break international law, is a shocking and breathtaking. we find ourselves astounded that members of the house of commons or lords would even countenance such a proposal. what we want is the british government, the european institutions, to sort out the issues about the protocol, to smooth its implementation. we accept that, but what we want is government to be resumed, power sharing to be resumed and for the first time in the north, for the first time a huge benchmark of equality where we have for the first time a nationalist first minister, acting for all and taking office. ., ., ., , office. how heated was the meeting? what did he say office. how heated was the meeting? what did he say directly? office. how heated was the meeting? what did he say directly? i office. how heated was the meeting? what did he say directly? i know - office. how heated was the meeting? what did he say directly? i know you| what did he say directly? i know you are
Hold a veto on the government that can deliver for you. hold a veto on the government that can deliverfor you. it hold a veto on the government that can deliver for you. it is not accessible there or here, and we have made that clear to him. we did not manage to convince him of the error of his ways, but be very, very clear that we will persist on these matters. d0 clear that we will persist on these matters. ,., , ., clear that we will persist on these matters. ,., i. ., matters. do you not.? inaudible inaudible worst that we needed to hear where that the british government would honour the established mechanisms and channels that have been agreed to smooth out, to consider and to resolve the hiccups, the difficulties that arrive, arise from the location of the protocol. everybody agrees there is no difference, no division of mines on that matter. where the line is drawn is when the british government says with its chest to start out that they will act unilaterally, that they wil