Precedents. the debate is settled. i think fundamentally the debate over same sex marriage for any imaginable future is settled. and the unsellalment around roe, i agree it s not the only reason the supreme court would end up revisiting it, but it is a signal this issue is fundamentally different and that the analogies being drawn to this idea that you re going to have essentially this role of recent decisions and decades-old decisions being rolled back doesn t make any sense. i m curious, if jeffrey, do you think clarence thomas would rule to overturn lebing v. virginia? is this actually an argument that s being advanced? i doubt it. but we re talking about you doubt it. i doubt it, absolutely. but could you say that clarence thomas let s just say clarence thomas can we agree, clarence thomas is not
Going to vote to overrule lebing v. virginia. i think it s unlikely. but remember clarence thomas thinks all these decisions should be returned to the states, that these decisions about personal behavior and personal property should go to the states and let the people decide. that s what this whole opinion is all about, let the people decide. senator davis, i m wondering what you make of ross argument and how concerned you think people should be. well, first of all, i don t think anyone who believes that abortion should continue to be allowed in every state in this country is shirking from the argument that it should be protected. and there s no attempt here to try to divert attention to other rights that may be threatened. it s simply a part of what opening this right to privacy and foreclosing it in some instances will create an opportunity to argue. and i think we all have to agree