need to start celebrating in advance. but that s the thing. we re in the eve season. there is some big eaves coming up. that s true. we hear eve, it might throw me off even more now when i hear you say it in december. but i need eaves all year long because fridays are very important to me, lawrence. and i have so little that gives me joy. you must leave me this. i get it. you know who is going to give you joy? secretary pete buttigieg, who is joining us tonight in this hour. and our law professional laurence tribe. he co-wrote a piece in august saying the justice department should conduct a criminal investigation of what donald trump did to try to violate election law on january 6 and before. and i want to check in with professor tribe tonight to see if this week may be the evidence base for and justification for a criminal investigation of donald trump has increased at all. certainly the january 6 investigators started talking in specific statutory language abo
i don t know, it might throw me off even more now. when i hear you say it in december. i need eaves all year long. because fridays are very important to me, lawrence. and i have so little that gives me joy. you must leave me this. i get it. you know what s going to give you joy? one of our guests that are joining us tonight. he co-wrote a piece in august saying that the justice department should conduct a criminal investigation of what donald trump did to try to violate election laws on january six. and i want to check in with professor laurence tribe to see if maybe the evidence base and justification for criminal investigation of donald trump has increased at all. well certainly, the january six investigators started talking in specific statutory language about what it is they are trying to figure out if trump did it. the language from liz cheney on this has been really provocative because it is deliberate, she is quoting federal statutes and they are making a public
People and keep people in that profession. some of the arrangements in terms of how people are trained and wind up on the hook for the costs of their raining can be problematic if they re not paired with a good income on the back end of that. similarly with these leasing arrangements. look, we ve got make sure that it s true what people are told when they re invited into this profession. now you talk to some truckers, they have had fantastic careers, good wages, benefits. that s especially true of the truckers who enjoy the protection of being the member of a union. we also got a lot who feel this is not the profession they signeded up for. we have to fix that or else our best recruitment efforts are just going to be filling a leaky bucket. the reporting in time magazine if you re a union trucker or independent trucker on your own. the unionized truckers have sensible work hours. and the independent truckers are just at the mercy of so many different crosscurrents. well, they re ty
Established in the bipartisan infrastructure law. so that is already established in the law. how do you hope that will help strengthen the trucker workforce? we need to make sure that this is the most attractive job possible. on one hand, we are driving more recruitment efforts. because we do know there are a lot of people seeking to get into this profession. that is where some of the work we are doing, for example to cut some red tape out of the process and get commercial driver licenses. so important. more veterans and other efforts. we also have this, there are a lot of conditions that are unfair. or unreasonable, that truckers face. as long as that persists, it is going to be difficult to attract people and keep people in that profession. some of the arrangements in terms of how people are training, they might wind up on the hook after the cost of their training which can be problematic if they are not paired with a good income on the end of that. similarly with these leasing arr
Ohio State University
farmdoc daily (11):106
farmdoc daily (11):106, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign, July 13, 2021. Permalink
Cover crops reduce nitrogen effluent in water and increase soil carbon over time, thereby providing environmental benefits, which may also translate into longer-term economic benefits. However, the costs associated with cover crops in the initial years usually exceed benefits accruing directly to farmers and landowners. Over time, benefits may increase and exceed costs. Land tenure and rental arrangements likely will impact adoption, with adoption more likely on owned farmland than rented farmland. Public policy that encourages cover crop adoption should consider rental arrangements’ impact on incentives. Similar incentive issues exist for other conservation practices, as well as carbon credit markets.