taken very seriously. but i would say that, if the affirmation is that nuclear or high level waste stored in this way in deep geological repositories is toxic, it s not emotional it s simply wrong. greenpeace in the united states says, every waste dump in the us leaks radiation into the environment, and nuclear plants themselves are running out of ways to store highly radioactive waste on site. it s simply incorrect. well. the whole amount of nuclear waste in the united states would fit in a stadium. as i say, there is a combination, an unhappy combination, i must say, of emotion or ideology yes, ideology and scientific incorrectness or inaccuracy. the technology exists. it s available. and it s been used to keep nuclear waste safely stored
wrapped up in this discussion about nuclear energy. are people being emotional when they say that nuclear waste being buried far beneath the earth is going to be toxic for thousands of years? greenpeace usa say this is not desirable and that there is no safe, reliable solution for dealing with the radioactive waste produced by nuclear plants. that s not people being emotional. that s very a very legitimate concern, isn t it? , , very legitimate concern, isn t it? , ., , it? of course, every opinion is legitimate it? of course, every opinion is legitimate and it? of course, every opinion is legitimate and has it? of course, every opinion is legitimate and has to - it? of course, every opinion is legitimate and has to be - it? of course, every opinion is| legitimate and has to be taken very seriously. but i would say that, if the affirmation is that, if the affirmation is that nuclear or high level waste stored in this way in deep geological repositories is toxic, it s not emoti