expressing her concerns and asking for a meeting, and took place, and her concerns for a meeting, and took place, and her concerns were expressed. regarding the hrc, they are willing to support and work with the scottish to support and work with the scottish government if they can. however. scottish government if they can. however, they make it clear their ongoing however, they make it clear their ongoing concerns are still on the record. ongoing concerns are still on the record. and ongoing concerns are still on the record, and that s where that rests. that addresses all the points he raised that addresses all the points he raised. but if any are not addressed, i am sure there is a chamber addressed, i am sure there is a chamber will ask those questions. douglas ross. he outlined how the uk government has douglas ross. he outlined how the uk government has sought douglas ross. he outlined how the uk government has sought to government has sought to constr
Government are going to have to come up government are going to have to come up with good reasons as to why they think it will adverse the equalities legislation with hard evidence and reasons why that is the case, this was raised relatively late in the process of the law making facilities that the scottish parliament have, this possibility, so the uk government will be on the back foot because the scottish government will raise the action and i would think the scottish government have got a strong case to argue it is beyond the powers of the uk government in terms of modification and i m not sure there s enough evidence that this law will modify the equalities legislation in the uk and equally i will be interested to see the reasons the uk give as to why they think it will have an adverse affect on that legislation. so i think the scottish government have a good case but there is a long way to go before it gets to the court. taste but there is a long way to go before it gets to the co