Special counsel . Eventually can he fire everyone . I mean, its going to be fascinating tomorrow. Were going to hear every one of those questions. What we dont know is how many answers were going to hear. Yeah. That were not sure of. Yeah. This question of Executive Privilege and what theyre going the call Executive Privilege and such a i mean thats a difficult legal theory anyway. Thats not a cut and dried thing even in the best of circumstances, i think were going to get into Appeals Court territory pretty quickly tomorrow. And i have a feeling that Jeff Sessions isnt going to rely on the feelings pleading that we heard last week from dan coats and the director of nsa. It is my feeling that i shouldnt talk about this. I have discomfort. Yeah. Yes. I have a gavel. We will seattle. Thank you, rachel. Thanks. When president nixon fired the special prosecutor investigating him, he did it on a friday night and shocked
headline writers who immediately called it the Saturday Night Massacre.
is on the left. if it is straightahead, the obstacle is in front of you. so you change course according to what you hear. these are the two men who helped develop it. using a sort of short range radar, it provides information but crucially not too much information. we both like very much music and sound and we thought that visually impaired people were lacking a device that could help us in their daily life and we thought that technology could do that. there are around 400 rangos in use, mostly in france, but also several other european countries. it is not cheap, costing more than $2000 but for laurance, it is priceless. tim allman, bbc news. now, do take a look at this. why would i betray you? we all
completely inexperienced in any case involving the white house, inexperienced in criminal law being asked by white house staffers do they need lawyers. and of course they do. and here he is telling them no, no, no, you don t need lawyers. that s clearly in violation of the new york bar s rule about his ability to advise people who might be involved in the case that his client is involved in. laurance, i i m not going to opine on the new york bar rules but think how generally inappropriate this is. if this is an employment related question, their advice ought to come from the white house counsel. mr. kasowitz s only professional obligation is to donald trump. so he cap be giving advice to anyone else. note how this is a piece of the standard process of failing to follow the standard legal procedures that keeps getting this white house into more and more trouble. brief examples that link all
house staff. as i just reported according to the new york times, he told aides gathered in one meeting who asked whether it was time to hire private lawyers it was not yet necessary. we re joined by the founder of d.c. report.org a non-profit that covers the trump administration. and walter dahlinger. walter, you have a lawyer, completely inexperienced in any case involving the white house, inexperienced in criminal law being asked by white house staffers do they need lawyers. and of course they do. and here he is telling them no, no, no, you don t need lawyers. that s clearly in violation of the new york bar s rule about his ability to advise people who might be involved in the case that his client is involved in. laurance, i i m not going to opine on the new york bar rules but think how generally inappropriate this is. if this is an employment related question, their advice ought to come from the white house counsel. mr. kasowitz s only professional obligation is to donald trum