role was supposed to be. it is risky out as we ve heard from him to take the stand and to mary s point there was a lot of one other strategic region though is the kind of dry run. a lot of his arguments for the removal are the same as his defense. and, if he wins removal that s a strong signal to him that, hey, this might work as my actual defense. if he gets slammed it s a strong signal to others as well? absolutely. want to move to federal. court absolutely. he gets landon thunders on the strong signal that it might not work out too well he might have to reconsider his strategy. i thought this testimony today though was more effective as a factual innocent defense saying it was not my fault i had to do this for my boss. trump didn t help him too much in a legal definition of what a job description. was i feel a lot of people from republican and democratic and nutrition status on what you do. katie, i want to also see ask you about the strategy of prosecutors playing f
the legal, what do you think the legal argument? there it does not fall within the job of the executive branch to do that. that s not to the state. i think secretary of state raffensperger seems to have a better concept of what this role was supposed to be. it is risky out as we ve heard from him to take the stand and to mary s point there was a lot of one other strategic region though is the kind of dry run. a lot of his arguments for the removal are the same as his defense. and, if he wins removal that s a strong signal to him that, hey, this might work as my actual defense. if he gets slammed it s a strong signal to others as well? absolutely. want to move to federal. court absolutely. he gets landon thunders on the strong signal that it might not work out too well he might have to reconsider his strategy. i thought this testimony today