masks i use at any one time. i use them for a week or two weeks straight. is that a good idea or bad idea? it s not a bad idea. originally they were designed as single use. what they find unless it becomes visibly soiled or there is damage to it or it becomes wet you can wear them for several days. many people do exactly as you do. they sort of rotate between a few different masks, even one for monday, one for tuesday, et cetera. so you can wear them several days at least. maybe even a couple of weeks. and the thing about the n 95, you have to make sure you are continuously inspecting them. i thought i was going to get in trouble. i appreciate it. thank you very much for that. a huge cyber attack crashing government websites in ukraine. a spokesman for the foreign ministry says it is too early to draw conclusions about who may be behind it. he does point out there is a long history of russian cyber
keepers did not do any violence, did not attack police officers. no, they don t jon, that s actually incorrect according to this indictment. it talks about them forcibly pushing into the capitol and past law enforcement. so that s just a misrepresentation of what s going on. you re talking about tough talk here. there s more than tough talk. there s talk about essentially overthrowing a government. and there are new things here. there are a lot of signal communications, including with your clients, that paint a very clear picture of what happened before the insurrection, during, and after. well, outside the indictment they admit they didn t damage any property. they claimed they organized some of that. which in court the entire document has to be put before the court, not snippets of things. there i read the indictment, jon. it says they forcibly pushed
knowsis a lie. because i ve talked to the trainer. i m calling the trainer as a witness. and that didn t happen. look at this is rhodes, your client. we will have to do a bloody, massively bloody revolution against them. that s not reactive. well, i think it is. from what everybody was saying what is that reactive to, jon? to what they believe the left and the deep state and other people were doing. it was a very common conversation people were having at the time that this is going south. and, you know, we re heading in a very bad way. wait. so what were they reacting don t just tell me vaguely what the deep state was doing, which is i don t even know what you re talking about. what were they reacting to specifically? if you re saying they weren t starting anything.
because this doesn t seem like tpeubgsz. this is your client. we will have to do a bloody, massively blood where revolution against them. that s what s going to have to happen. . yeah. i think a lot of people pre predicted things like that. and, you know, i believe that whether somebody wanted it to happen and where we re headed may not be the same thing. my main concern in how to defend this is i want to see the entire conversations. he said, we aren t getting through this without a civil war. too late for that. prepared your mind, body, spirit. this is what he was telling other oath keepers. right. but that doesn t mean he s the one starting the civil war. i believe that too. but i don t think people on the right are going to be responsible for the civil war. they were training the indictment shows them training for ambushes, jon. . yeah. which is which the government
congressional criticism. but as i go through it, there s more social media discussions that are named. but i would be concerned with the fbi found some new revelation that shows they will go after very seriously. it s about 18 individual oath keepers now 20, i guess, that are in the usa caldwell group that will have serious work to go after that. oath keepers feel like their videos in the smartphone video camera revolution, the whole new world we have now with all this new video, show people did do what the government alleges, but it wasn t them. they had very tough talk among themselves, that s true. as you say, they are going after leaders in this sense, what they perceive to be leaders. the government admits these oath