members, city employees and the public, the board of supervisors legislative chamber and committee room are closed. however, members will be participating remotely. this is taken pursuant to the stayed wide stay at home order and all local orders and committee members will attend the meeting through video conference and participate to the same extent as if they were physically present. public comment will be available on each item on this agenda. channel 26 and sfgovtv.org are streaming the number across the screen. each speaker will be allowed two minutes to speak. they re opportunities to speak during the public comment period are available by calling (415)655-0001. again, that number is (415)655-0001. the meeting i.d. is 146-729-4222. again, that s 146-729-4222. press pound and pound again. when connected, you will hear the meeting discussion but you will be muted and in listening mode only. when an interest of interest comes up dial star 3 to be added to the speaker line.
our overall housing production targets. we have struggled in the past coming in with less than half of this number of affordable units as well as lower level of production of housing overall. i wanted to add that we did not exam whether these targets were the perfect targets or acknowledging we have struggled to meet these targets in the past. we wanted to look at policy and investment to allow us to meet these at minimum and leave that discussion open to the public and policymakers about whether different targets should be pursued in the future. one of the key policy issues we explored was where new housing would be added and what it would look like. initial analysis showed that we do need to add additional capacity for housing to be able to sustain the level of production at 5,000 units over the 30 year timeframe. what this map that you are looking at shows is our past reductions since 2005 in pink. the pipeline is shown in hollow circles. it is on the east side around down
working on planning trees as volunteers, you are part of different boards or different organizations ar advocating for trees and we are the end of the line at board of appeals. we don t make policy. we consider whether or not they issue permits that the city has put in place have been properly followed. that s really where we are and so working with your supervisors organizing quite frankly, to make this remain a priority, obviously they re taxed to with the covid-19 response so being respectful and tactical and strategic about what you are advocate forgeron that being said, the climate crisis continues and other things continue as covid-19 might be in the forefront so keep organizing and keep working with the board of supervisors and put your treasure there for legislative change and fixes that can help. folks like mr. buck and others to have the tools and resources they need to implement the policy that s will hopefully protect our can may and grow our can pee in the long r
on each item on this agenda. channel 26 and sfgovtv.org are streaming the number across the screen. each speaker will be allowed two minutes to speak. they re opportunities to speak during the public comment period are available by calling (415)655-0001. again, that number is (415)655-0001. the meeting i.d. is 146-729-4222. again, that s 146-729-4222. press pound and pound again. when connected, you will hear the meeting discussion but you will be muted and in listening mode only. when an interest of interest comes up dial star 3 to be added to the speaker line. best practices are to call from a quiet location, speak clearly and slowly and turn down your television or radio. if you may submit public comment. e-mail myself to the lapped usee and traffic clerk at ericamajor. if you submit public comment a e-mail it will be forwarded to the supervisors included as part of the official file. i was asked upon are expected to appear on the board of supervisor agenda on august 11th
tumlin will talk about this, but last week we did have a press event with supervisors peskin and preston announcing that we will be delaying our fare increases. obviously when we were voting upon that fare increase, we could not have understood the magnitude of what was before us and not to mention we didn t really have a path forward in being able to fund the operations, so i want to thank you supervisors peskin and preston for working with us to come up with solutions which i cannot tell you what they are today. but to look at how we can fill those funding gaps which primarily effect us in year two of the budget cycle, not so much in year one. that will be coming back to us in the future. and also with that we will not be having a charter amendment related to sfmta. thank director tumlin for his work in working with the supervisors, and just say it was a pleasure to be there to represent the board last week at kirkland lard. and with that, i will turn it on to the next