Defense attorneys announced they have new dna evidence that shows no trace of echols or the other defendants at the crime scene. even some of the victims relatives who initially agreed with the verdicts all three of them are punks, punks! now think the men in jail are innocent. i would like to see another trial, give them a fair trial, present the evidence that really wasn t presented in the other trials, and if they re guilty, so be it. that s where they stay. but if they re not, god, don t put somebody to death because, you know, oops. as damien s lawyers, we are not taking on the burden of who actually committed these crimes. the question for the court should be and will be would a reasonable juror looking at the entire picture now, all the
Paramount importance to him. but the interests at stake here are far broader. and that is because we are dealing with pure questions of law about the interpretation of what i ll call the dna statute. what is the meaning of this arkansas statute? there is language in that statute that says if the dna evidence excludes the defendant as the source of the dna, which it did in our case, then the trial court has to consider all the evidence whether it was admitted at trial or not to see what a reasonable juror would do today. this statute was passed to exonerate the innocent. the state has really proposed an orwellian interpretation of the term all. all simply means all. the state took the position that in weighing all the evidence, what the statute meant to say was that the court consider only all the evidence of guilt, but not the evidence
And higher car loan rates. it s a problem waiting to happen. check your credit score, check your credit report at experian.com. kelly s court is back in session. food stamp recipients rushing registers in louisiana after a computer glitch let s them shop like there is no limit. this is cell phone video from spring hill where shoppers emptied shelves and loaded up carts take advantage of the two-hour outage. one woman only had 49 cents on her card but collected $700 in groceries. so who is going to flip this bill? is it the american taxpayer? joining me now fox news legal analyst and a former prosecutor. who foots that bill? it s going to be consumers or xerox. xerox was the one who is manning
when you think about it, isn t that what retirement should be, paying ourselves to do what we love? two updates for you. kelly s court. louisiana department of children and family services says those retailers wal-mart who chose not to use the emergency procedures that limit sales $50 a card holder during emergencies will be responsible for any additional amount they allow. wal-mart is on the hook. which is the right result. why should the taxpayer have to pay. wal-mart allowed people to run up the bill when they didn t hatch the money to do it. there you have it. that question answered. want to till you that on our facebook page right now, we have posted two things that may be of interest. one the package on the world war
Just months ago he was arrested on drugs and weapons charges but the judge and prosecutors let him walk with a slap on the wrist. he s not feel thing the love for the legal system, as you can see here. yesterday he s flipping the double bird while inside the courtroom as he was being charged. that s respectful. joining me now arthur aydala. great to see you both. what s happening, your honor? judge kelly s court. that s where the fun stuff happens. you would know. we had that segment already. arthur, what s the story with this guy with the double finger in the middle of court. he was let go by some judge who gave him a slap on a the wrist for what? it s a brooklyn case. judge suzanne mondo who is an excellent judge. she was chief of the homicide bureau. she put a lot of bad guys away.