Became a ph.d, what classes did you take? judge, i would like to make an argument at this point on behalf of my client, it s position based on a mail order ph.d which a person doesn t have to take classes, doesn t have to take any resident courses from a nonqualified school is not an expert in arkansas, and we object to the court qualifying him as an expert. i m not sure in arkansas or any other state you have to have any kind of degree to be an expert in any particular field. if he can demonstrate knowledge, education, specious, and training in the field, you could have a third grade education if you have other education, experience and training that qualifies you as an expert. so i m not persuaded at all about your argument about a mail order ph.d. the early 1970s and 80s, we began to see the fbi academy, police officers coming in from around the world. and the cops were kind of
Counsel. good morning. may it please the court, mr. echols has been to this court several times in the last decade challenging his conviction directly and collaterally. and this statute does not call for a retrial. it s not about trying somebody again for the state to prove guilt twice. counselor, what harm is there in allowing him to present the evidence in the last 17 years? i m sorry? what harm is there in allowing him to present all evidence? well, the harm is in the finality of a criminal judgment that is not demonstrated to have any constitutional or procedural defect, and just to try it again. you re suggesting, it sounds to me as every 15 or 17 years or so, we really ought to try cases again to reestablish guilt. i think it s clear that the animating purpose here is not to retry. so the harm is to the criminal
Transcripts for CNN Paradise Lost 3 Purgatory 20140217 03:25:30 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Echols spoke for the first time about a defense allegation of jury misconduct in the trial of the west memphis 3. davis says the jury foreman contacted an attorney during the trial 15 years ago. we know from a lawyer who has now submitted some paperwork to the court who talked to that jury foreman, and who became aware that the jury foreman was considering some information that the jury foreman shouldn t have been considering. any time you re caught in a situation where you know something that calls into question a judgment that has been made by a court, when you re sitting at home in your easy chair and you read an article about somebody that is facing a death penalty and you feel like there is something you might could have done, it s troubling. and i m getting dangerously
That with your attorneys. he ll be in your custody for immediate transportation to the department of corrections to carry out the orders of this court. hey guys! sorry we re late. did you run into traffic? no, just had to stop by the house to grab a few things. you stopped by the house? uh-huh. yea. alright, whenever you get your stuff, run upstairs, get cleaned up for dinner. you leave the house in good shape? yea. yea, of course. [ sportscaster talking on tv ] last-second field go yea, sure ya did. [ male announcer ] introducing at&t digital life.