while we know all of those parking spaces and we are addressing making sure people have information to drive to all those spaces. the main focus of what we ve been working on recently is the music concourse area. especially because museums reopened and academy of science will be reopening. [please stand by] we re going to add tour bus parking area and six more accessible spaces on martin luther king drive and four more on nancy pelosi so that would get us to the 18 faces that we re losing with the j.f.k. closure. we re having people with knowing where they can drive and where they can go to drop someone off and park or with their paratransit can drop them off. so the other thing that we re addressing is the communication to ensure that there s clear information available in multiple formats. so, we are going to be providing maps and detailed directions on our website and to the disability community and every way that we can and to make sure that people have access to that i
don t disturb the proceedings. appellants, permit holders, and respondents are each given seven minutes to present their case and a three-minute rebuttal. time may be limited for public comment to two minutes if the agenda is long or there is a large number of speakers. four votes are required to grant an appeal of a building permit or a section 348 on are are section 328 hearing. regarding public access and participation, they are of paramount importance to the board, and every effort has been made to implement the in-person sharing process. sfgovtv is broading and streaming this hearing broadcasting and streaming this hearing life, and we will have the ability for full public comment on today s agenda. to watch the meeting on t.v., go to cable channel 78. a link to the live stream is found on the home page of our website at sfgov.org/boa, and public comment can be provided in two ways. one, you can join the zoom meeting by computer. please go to our website and click on
the board legal clerk, and legal assistant. i m julie rosenberg, the board s executive director. we will also be joined by representatives from the city departments that will be presenting before the board this evening. scott sanchez, senior building inspector, and joe duffy, department of building inspection. the board requests that you turnoff all phones or electronic devices so that they don t disturb the proceedings. appellants, permit holders, and respondents are each given seven minutes to present their case and a three-minute rebuttal. time may be limited for public comment to two minutes if the agenda is long or there is a large number of speakers. four votes are required to grant an appeal of a building permit or a section 348 on are are section 328 hearing. regarding public access and participation, they are of paramount importance to the board, and every effort has been made to implement the in-person sharing process. sfgovtv is broading and streaming this hearin
this evening. scott sanchez, senior building inspector, and joe duffy, department of building inspection. the board requests that you turnoff all phones or electronic devices so that they don t disturb the proceedings. appellants, permit holders, and respondents are each given seven minutes to present their case and a three-minute rebuttal. time may be limited for public comment to two minutes if the agenda is long or there is a large number of speakers. four votes are required to grant an appeal of a building permit or a section 348 on are are section 328 hearing. regarding public access and participation, they are of paramount importance to the board, and every effort has been made to implement the in-person sharing process. sfgovtv is broading and streaming this hearing broadcasting and streaming this hearing life, and we will have the ability for full public comment on today s agenda. to watch the meeting on t.v., go to cable channel 78. a link to the live stream is f
the goal of averaging is to allow flexibility and design. in our case we have an unusual case. in the front line the houses are angled and stepped. the following of the code means we take the difference of the adjacent neighbors and divide that by half to get the front yard setback. in this case, this is the detach line. we chose here to step this. if we go beyond the front yard setback, we have to look at the setback on the sides. we need to prevent any further growth to the front. the planning department have confirmed that the setback confirms to 137 of the planning code. the concern about sunlight claims that for 45 minutes of the sunlight is egregious. he does not acknowledge that for approximately seven months of the year the proposed project has no effect at all. can you pause the time, please. the president lost her connection. my apologies, everyone. she s connecting and will let us know when she gets back on. she s bac