Pete we begin this hour with a Fox News Alert and Israel Defense Ministry Launching real tear Air Strike Attacks against suspected hamas air targets along the gaza strip this. Is after the israeli Prime Minister declared war following islamist infiltrating israeli territory in a multifront surprise Terrorist Attack against civilians. Carly the white house is responding and National Security spokeswoman addressing the attack saying the u. S. Unequivocally condemns the unprovoked attacks by hamas terrorist against israeli civilians. Theres never any justifyification for any terrorism. More than 22 dead and 500 hurt. Will trey yingst is on the ground in Southern Israel with the latest. Trey. Reporter absolutely. Were getting new numbers now indicating at least 40 israelis are dead and more than 700 wounded, and dozens taken hostage into the gaza strip. Right now off in the distance theres an Israeli Attack helicopter firing missiles into the northern part of the gaza strip. Weve heard exp
gregg: well, that s what this is. correct. but off situation of a detective who now you have to assume now that the george zimmerman defense team is going to have so much fodder with this demotion. he s now going to be lumped in with the police chief as almost part of the problem. he was part of the solution fort prosecution. gregg: you know what? we have now a transcript of the police interview that zimmerman did that night, the ren actment the next day on videotape, plethora of evidence. david issues there is something interesting. it s the physical evidence. gashes, broken nose, bruises on the head of zimmerman and a paramedic will say his entire face was covered with blood. wouldn t that physical evidence tend to corroborate the defendant s story? that s what s going to come in is the physical evidence. not the detective s statement. so yes, absolutely that type of physical evidence will go towards the justifyification, will lay into self-defense.
Defense attorneys are being resourced in this case. for example, one of them complained they haven t had a dedicated translator for a year and the designateed attorney doesn t speak arabic. they make the claim that the military wants to keep information secret because it s embarrassing. there really are sources and methods about future attacks and future dangers. again, i understand the skepticism. it is not a justifyification to not disclose information because it is embarrassing or because it violates a law. i was in court in 2008 when the menem first arraigned and they tried to take control then by acting as their own attorneys. clearly they re trying to do the same thing today by frustrating the process by refusing to cooperate. and what seems to have been lost in today s hearing is the fact