welcome to the beat. i m ari melber joining you live on this monday to start the week and the holiday. donald trump hit with brand new restrictions hit with his government trial and now under court order blocking him from discussing trial evidence in public this is a kind of a brush back it limits donald trump s ability, at least the way the rules are set, to respond to statements that may also quite bother him new condemnations coming from former trump administration officials themselves, shredding the legal and other denials that donald trump has made. i don t need to read the indictment or believe its allegations are true, although i m pretty confident they are. it was very disturbing. based on his actions, if proven true, no. it s irresponsible actions that places our nation at risk. the fact of the matter is he is a consummate narcissist and he constantly engages in reckless conduct those are just some of the brutal rebukes and experienced factual takes from pe
years ago. yesterday the court considered claims that google allowed isis to post hundreds of videos online aimed at inciting violence and algorithms helped isis recruit efforts along the way. the audio of some of those deliberations inside the high court. the thumb nails is based upon what the all going if if the videos don t appear out of thin air. they must be targeted to something. dana: more on all this we re live in washington. david spunt. it s getting underway right now. yesterday justice kagan asked the question to laughter in the courtroom should these nine justices be wading into the waters saying they may not be the best people to understand the internet. today s case focused on liability. can twitter be held liable by the families of terror victims. the second big case involving big tech before the court this week. family of a man killed in an isis attack in turkey in 2017 sued twitter, google and facebook arguing the platforms posted terrorist videos o