With the findings in the horowitz report. Horrow its seems to be giving the fbi that part of the investigation saying its a clean bill. They had enough reason to do this investigation. Everybody who was interviewed cements to indicate they did not open an investigation. Evan perez, thank you so much. Joining our panel now, we have with us jim bakker. You are not singled out the report makes clear the fbi failed when it came to the administering the fisa warrants, too much was left out or not presented to the court. Do you accept what the Inspector General is saying . I am there are two big groups of conclusions, one is, it was not a politically motivated
investigation and it was properly predicated with us goingforward with that investigation. It was malpractice for us not to open this investigation. All of the statements that it was a hoax are wrong. The investigation was not a coup or a coup attempt. Having said that, he does point out many mistakes that were made with respect to err
blower come in, and not litting us know if we talked to the more than half a dozen original sources for the whistle blower s complaint in the first place, the guy has to file an addendum with that clarification sentence, one thing they did do in their report is they published the phone records of the president s personal lawyer, the phone records of a member of the press and the phone records of the chairman of the inning tell against committees political opponent representative nunes. that s what these guys did, and that s their effort to impeach the president of the united states 11 months before an election. the gentleman s time is expired. unanimous consent. thank you, mr. chairman. i d like to focus on the facts surrounding the president s abuse of power. gentlemen, gentlemen. gentlemen i ask unanimous consent that the report by the majority staff on the judiciary constitutional