Even one republican could block it from happening, and that would require a much lengthier process of which he would still need 10 republicans to cross over and vote with democrats there are at least four of these judicial nominees that have been bottled up in the judiciar committee who are considered to be highly controversial, and would need all the democratic votes to get over the threshold, so the idea that republicans are just going to go along with this replacement plan without any kind of negotiation i think, chris, is a bit of a fantasy for democrats. we re going to have to see how this all plays out next week. how big of a conundrum is this for democrats, chuck schumer in specific, feinstein is a progressive icon. she s been a trail blazer. how do you balance that against the fact that frankly her absence is a problem in a 50/50 senate yeah, i think it s notable that it s a lot of younger progressive voices who don t have that reverence for senator feinstein that are very
Just on this issue, but th fact that the republican turned their backs with th majority of our people, whic is abortion access and they re also turning their backs on gun safety legislation, so that the young people in al across the country are mobilizing especially in tennessee. so, you are going to see thi kind of a mine vie mobilization because of th entrenchment of our rights and i think the question is is that just mobilization for single election? or are you actuall fundamentally reshaping th american electorate, and american politics for decades? the texas case, i don t need t tell you, it will likely end u before the supreme court in the midst of the conflict o interest controversy, you have justice thomas responding to a new report from propublica showing her to crash trips pai for by a conservativ billionaire. he s calling the troops person hospitality from a close friend i wonder what you and your colleagues on the judiciar
Mobilizing especially in tennessee. so, you are going to see thi kind of a mine vie mobilization because of th entrenchment of our rights and i think the question is is that just mobilization for single election? or are you actuall fundamentally reshaping th american electorate, and american politics for decades? the texas case, i don t need t tell you, it will likely end u before the supreme court in the midst of the conflict o interest controversy, you have justice thomas responding to a new report from propublica showing her to crash trips pai for by a conservativ billionaire. he s calling the troops person hospitality from a close friend i wonder what you and your colleagues on the judiciar committee see as your role i this we have not had you hearings, and a number of us including the chair of the judiciary committee has said t chief justice roberts asking
Showing her to crash trips pai for by a conservativ billionaire. he s calling the troops person hospitality from a close friend i wonder what you and your colleagues on the judiciar committee see as your role i this we have not had you hearings, and a number of us including the chair of the judiciary committee has said t chief justice roberts asking for investigations into justic thomas whereas, my gosh, anyon would know that having someone to the tune of literally millions of dollars over the last few decades, and no one should know that that is not good and it just adds to everyone s questioning of the supreme court and why the judges tha we appoint for life a really important. they should not. we are bringing thei ideological perspectives t decide these cases, which is exactly where judge kacsmary
You can go down in crazy right wing nut so information put ou there that is not factual. but it is interesting, i think with fox, their big thing is how do they settle or not. some people would argue that they have a judiciar responsibility to the board to settle this into the because it can get ver expensive. but i m curious about how fo treats the republica candidates for president well, yeah, that is somethin we are all very curious abou and we ll be watching closely. but bottom line on this, david how do you see this ending what kind of impact do you think it has on fox news, both legally and among its viewers? a, if it goes to trial, i think it could potentially be landmark case up there with ne york times v. sullivan for different reasons. but this is one of the largest news platforms in the entire country that has been allege that they acted with malice to