the judge forcefully rejected that and lost variations of that argument in other contexts as well as mark meadows. this has been decided at many different levels and many different ways, civil and criminal, mark meadows when he tried to remove the case to federal course. the judge said this wasn t part of your federal judge. no judge state, at any level claim for something that they did in relation to january 6 was within their job. no judge has accepted that. the people claiming they were acting within the scope of their job are zero for all time. nobody yet has opinion given any legal benefit on that road and this is a reason why trump has a steep uphill climb. you say that of course because there will be a live audio stream of tomorrow s argument but not cameras in the courtroom many we re at the middle level here, the district court already has rejebtd his argument. this is the federal court of appeals for the d.c. circuit. this will be a three-judge panel
Case
Judge
Ways
Argument
Variations
Contexts
Levels
Criminal
Mark-meadows
Something
People
Course