And make up your own mind. What we try to do in the book, in our commentary and insider tips and a cast of characters is make this as easily digestible and understandable as possible. For lawyers, and nonlawyers alike. We understand there are various rationales for the decisions made. As part of that mission we tried in this hour to explain some of the choices. And the implications for all of these delies. And we are so grateful to all of you for joining us for this hour long special. We really appreciate it. Im melissa marie. Im andrew weissnan. Goodnight. Good evening once again. Im stephanie ruhle. We are 235 days away from the election. We have a very special night cap we will get to in a moment featuring an amazing lineup of Student Journalists. We start with the news of the day. Fulton coupty Da Fani Willis will remain on the trump case. The judge ruled she could stay if nathan wade, the prosecutor, stepped down. Wade in fact did just that. Here is my colleague Blayne Alexander w
it was driven by nixon but operationally, it was haldeman doing it. on october 25th, two weeks before the election the post-front page headline pointed the figure at the number one inner circle, bob haldeman. woodward and bernstein reported under questioning of grand jury sloan had a campaign secret fund. it was a journalistic coup, but they were wrong. i had never been asked a question about bob haldeman. sloan, in fact, had not named haldeman in his testimony the white house pounced. i don t respect the type of journal im, the shabby journalism that is being practiced by the washington woft. i use the term shoddy, shabby journalism. i ve used the term character assassination. this was their opportunity to discredit the post woodward and bernstein and bury the story.
inclined to consider what sean hannity is saying, just know that he had a connection to president trump that hasn t been disclosed until now. this is an interesting point you make. i just think it s good practice for pundits to be as honest as they can about situations like this so that the viewers are adequately informed. is gabe still on the line with me? have i got gabe sherman? i m here. to this point gabe makes, there are benefits and advantages that come shrouded in the cloak of journal im. is there a rule, is there something about being a pundit or is a guy like sean hannity, certainly in the last 18 months, given his tight relationship with ump were, his remarkably favorable interviews, the degree to which they talk, the advice that is sought from sean hannity by donald trump, the fact that donald trump tweets about sean hannity, does he have any rules he has to follow? and will this make any
and then it got down to the third person at the department of justice. who didn t care about there being cause. the american people cared, and they protested and the president richard nixon had to appoint a second special prosecutor, three days after firing him. that is a lesson we should all keep in mind, if there isn t cause, and so far there is absolutely no cause, then the president should be warned and should learn from history. it was one of those moments where people started thinking, hey, maybe this president nixon fella has something to hide, something to worry about. our thanks to our leadoff panel, including two of the finest kens in washington-based journal im. ken dilanian, and ken vogel, thank you to you too. jill wine-banks as well, for joining us tonight from chicago. coming up for us, steve bannon unplugged in vanity fair. why there s an even more intense civil war, and a firestorm coming.