being a great friend of this show. all right. hello again, everyone. thank you so much for being with me. i m fredricka whitfield. right now a heart-felt tribute to queen elizabeth ii is under way in london. thousands pouring in to say a final farewell to their monarch. the last hour we saw the queen s eight grandchildren holding a vigil as she lies in state. the royal family also greeting world leaders as they arrive today ahead of the queen s funeral, which is monday. let s go straight to london right now. max foster, richard quest and anna stewart are following this historic event. max, to you first. this vigil, with the queen s grandchildren, was only about 15 minutes. wow, even with that brevity, you felt such love being exuded from these family members, from these young men and women who were paying the greatest homage to their grandmother. reporter: yeah. something they all wanted to do. outline, for william and harry, more practice at this sort of thing. for the
That how it plays internationally all those things up for grabs in this first hour on the president s passage by the Supreme Court parts of it of the travel ban. For republicans 2027488001 for democrats 2027488000, independents 2027488002. You can tweet us cspan wj and post on our facebook page. Facebook. Com cspan. Heres a map of those questions. Those countries in question that are affected by this travel ban. Parts of it put in play by the Supreme Court decision yesterday. As you look at the wall street journal breaks down what it means. Saying that for 90 days those citizens of those countries iran libya syria may not travel to the use United States. The the Administration May issue additional waivers on a case by case basis. It says admission of refugees will be suspended for 120 day. Those scheduled for transfer into the u. S. Wont be affected and refugees with that bon fide relationship status the u. S. Will be allowed. A review will determine whether other countries are providi
On the subject is important as important as the Supreme Court nomination, bipartisanship should be essential. That is what 60 votes does. Hat is nothing new it was a varmint by each of president obamas nominations. In my mind, 60 votes is the appropriate way to go. Whether there is a democratic president or republican president. Democratic Republican Senate senate. Lican because a 60 vote threshold is essential, those who say at the process ross is a that there are only two possible willts that the Senate Confirm this nominee or the republicans will use the Nuclear Option to confirm their choice are dead wrong. That is a false choice. If this nominee cannot meet the stain standards same standards that the republicans insisted upon for obamas republican Supreme Court nominees, the problem lies not with this senate, but with the nominee. It should not be to change the rules of the senate, but to change the nominee to someone who can earn 60 votes. 60 votes produces a mainstream candidate
On the subject is important as important as the Supreme Court nomination, bipartisanship should be essential. That is what 60 votes does. Hat is nothing new it was a varmint by each of president obamas nominations. In my mind, 60 votes is the appropriate way to go. Whether there is a democratic president or republican president. Democratic Republican Senate senate. Lican because a 60 vote threshold is essential, those who say at the process ross is a that there are only two possible willts that the Senate Confirm this nominee or the republicans will use the Nuclear Option to confirm their choice are dead wrong. That is a false choice. If this nominee cannot meet the stain standards same standards that the republicans insisted upon for obamas republican Supreme Court nominees, the problem lies not with this senate, but with the nominee. It should not be to change the rules of the senate, but to change the nominee to someone who can earn 60 votes. 60 votes produces a mainstream candidate
This body and everyone in america. The future of the Supreme Court. Last night, the president nominated judge neil gorsuch. We in the senate have a to examinenal duty his record robustly, exhaustively, and comprehensively. We need to revise its consent if consent if weand see fit. We democrats will insist on a rigorous but fair process. There will be 60 votes for confirmation. Anyone member can require it, Many Democrats already have. T is the right thing to do on the subject is important as important as the Supreme Court nomination, bipartisanship should be essential. That is what 60 votes does. Hat is nothing new it was a varmint by each of president obamas nominations. In my mind, 60 votes is the appropriate way to go. Whether there is a democratic president or republican president. Democratic Republican Senate senate. Lican because a 60 vote threshold is essential, those who say at the process ross is a that there are only two possible willts that the Senate Confirm this nominee or